Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-29-2008, 09:28 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,154,953 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

(If this article is the topic of another thread please point me to it! )

I know Frank Rich doesn't exactly admire Palin/McCain but this may be his most exasperated editorial yet.

The editorial contains a lot of snippy jibes that will pique the ire of McCain defenders, but please look beyond all that to the events of the McCain timeline of the last few days. No matter by whom they're presented, they paint a pretty alarming picture of a campaign out of control, and a man who either lives in a fantasy world himself or trusts that we do.

If you want to criticize the editorial, please dont just rely on shouts and insults but please at least include links to facts that support your claims or debunk the author's. Thanks!

New York Times: McCain's Suspension Bridge to Nowhere
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-29-2008, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Home is where the heart is
15,402 posts, read 28,948,929 times
Reputation: 19090
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
The editorial contains a lot of snippy jibes that will pique the ire of McCain defenders, but please look beyond all that to the events of the McCain timeline of the last few days.
Love the opening paragraph, especially.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2008, 10:02 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,154,953 times
Reputation: 6195
I know, I think he had a good time writing this
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2008, 10:09 AM
 
Location: CO
2,886 posts, read 7,135,479 times
Reputation: 3988
Another NY Times editorial, this one from Nicholas Kristoff, calls McCain
Impulsive, Impetuous, Impatient

Quote:
Suppose John McCain had been in the White House in October 1962, facing one of the great tests of the modern presidency. If so, we might remember that period not as “the Cuban missile crisis” but as “World War III.”
. . .But it’s equally clear that in recent years Mr. McCain has become impish cubed — impulsive, impetuous and impatient — and those are perilous qualities in a commander in chief.

Although he is frantically trying to distance himself from President Bush, Mr. McCain, by his own accounting, would be more Bushian in foreign policy than even Mr. Bush is now. While Mr. Bush has been forced to accept more sensible policies in his second term, Mr. McCain has become steadily more of a neocon in the cowboy role that Mr. Bush played in his first term, prone to solving problems with stealth bombers rather than United Nations resolutions. . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2008, 08:33 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,703,250 times
Reputation: 14818
Mr. Rich nails it again. Thanks for posting this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2008, 06:38 PM
 
914 posts, read 2,919,423 times
Reputation: 642
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzco View Post
Another NY Times editorial, this one from Nicholas Kristoff, calls McCain
Impulsive, Impetuous, Impatient
Too bad McCain wasn't in control during the Cuban Missile Crisis, because if he was, it wouldn't have gotten that far. JFK was a foreign policy disaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2008, 08:06 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,040,852 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by looking4home View Post
Too bad McCain wasn't in control during the Cuban Missile Crisis, because if he was, it wouldn't have gotten that far. JFK was a foreign policy disaster.
You mean the nukes would have been launched?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2008, 08:16 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,278,203 times
Reputation: 1893
Perfect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2008, 11:33 PM
 
914 posts, read 2,919,423 times
Reputation: 642
It's obvious many of you are too young to know what I'm refering to. Do some research - or I'll sick Katie on ya!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top