Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2012, 08:57 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,597,365 times
Reputation: 3602

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiegirl7 View Post
Yes, he has had more flip flops than Romney ever thought about having.
Remember, those on the left do not consider a flip flop by Obama as a flip flop, only changing his mind. When the other guy changes his mind, That is a flip flop.

Just ask these self proclaimed superior intellectuals, they will tell you that they have to be correct because of who they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2012, 01:08 PM
 
665 posts, read 1,247,153 times
Reputation: 364
Those are very narrow issues, romney flip flops on big things like abortion.
hell he even dissed ronald regan then said he supported.

negotiating over small budget items like the nuclear option is not really comparable
plus Obama rejected that nuclear option before Sen Brown got to the senate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Salt Lake City
28,156 posts, read 30,254,826 times
Reputation: 13141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51 View Post
If Obama does it, his followers call it "open minded".

If a Republican does it, they call it flip-flopping.
I agree completely, except that I don't think it's necessarily a Democrat vs. Republican thing. Everybody admires someone who is open-minded and willing to change his position on something over time -- as long as they like the person whose changing his mind. If they like the person, they're "open-minded" and "flexible," "willing to admit they were wrong," etc. If they don't like him, the exact same characteristics are known as "flip-flopping." This isn't just in politics, but is even more noticeable in politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 01:53 PM
 
26,775 posts, read 15,338,854 times
Reputation: 14901
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptug101 View Post
Those are very narrow issues, romney flip flops on big things like abortion.
hell he even dissed ronald regan then said he supported.

negotiating over small budget items like the nuclear option is not really comparable
plus Obama rejected that nuclear option before Sen Brown got to the senate.
Obama promised the American people big things that he either had no intention of fulfilling or broke at the first chance he had.

-No lobbyists in his staff -- flip flop

-Most transparent government ever, 5 days of public debate -- flip flopped multiple times on in his first month

-Cut the deficit in half -- never even tried

-Coal -- he literally changed his stance depending on what state he was currently in

These are big things, these are promises that he made and broke, how can you trust flip flop Obama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 02:36 PM
 
665 posts, read 1,247,153 times
Reputation: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Obama promised the American people big things that he either had no intention of fulfilling or broke at the first chance he had.

-No lobbyists in his staff -- flip flop

-Most transparent government ever, 5 days of public debate -- flip flopped multiple times on in his first month

-Cut the deficit in half -- never even tried

-Coal -- he literally changed his stance depending on what state he was currently in

These are big things, these are promises that he made and broke, how can you trust flip flop Obama?
There are two types of lobbyist corporate interest and advocacy groups
.Obama said any ""new"" staff members would not be lobbyist.
which is true none of his new staff are lobbyist(corporate interest)
all the corporate interest people are hold overs from the bush administration.

The only new lobbyist obama has on his team is a guy from a anti-teen smoking advocacy group thats hardly a corporate interest lobbyist.

as far as the deficit bohener walked away the debts deal not his fault.

as far as coal,he has been ok with coal as long as they meet certain requirements he proposed the new rules they went into affect and some plants couldnt live with that.

adjusting to governing is alot different than changing your mind on a campaign trail because of polls. We live in a democrtic republic no president can get what he wants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 02:43 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,535,007 times
Reputation: 3511
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
* He ripped Hillary Clinton for months for voting to list Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Days after Clinton conceded, Obama flipped and said he supported the definition.

* Obama repeatedly vowed to meet with various heads of terror states - most notably Ahmadinejad of Iran - "without preconditions." Then, with the nomination in sight, he zigzagged: "There's no reason why we would necessarily meet with Ahmadinejad. He's not the most powerful person in Iran."

* In October, he supported NAFTA expansion. In March, campaigning in the Ohio primary, he called for a "reopening" of the trade pact's terms. This week, he called his own primary rhetoric "overheated" and said NAFTA has had a positive effect on the US economy.

* Yesterday, after signaling opposition to nuclear power, he told Democratic governors he's open to expanding it.

Read more: EVER-CHANGING 'CHANGE' - NYPOST.com
I believe you fail to understand that candidates for public office ... any public office ... typically tell us they'll do one thing and then after being elected frequently do the opposite. Once someone is in office, in this case assuming the role of President, the situations are entirely different than what one encounters in a "what if" on the campaign. This is true of all Presidents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 02:46 PM
 
26,775 posts, read 15,338,854 times
Reputation: 14901
PolitiFact | The Obameter: Tougher rules against revolving door for lobbyists and former officials

Obama - broken promise on lobbyists. No more excuses. He broke the promise period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 03:10 PM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,597,365 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
I believe you fail to understand that candidates for public office ... any public office ... typically tell us they'll do one thing and then after being elected frequently do the opposite. Once someone is in office, in this case assuming the role of President, the situations are entirely different than what one encounters in a "what if" on the campaign. This is true of all Presidents.
So, in your opinion, this makes reniging on promises alright?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 03:12 PM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,597,365 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katzpur View Post
I agree completely, except that I don't think it's necessarily a Democrat vs. Republican thing. Everybody admires someone who is open-minded and willing to change his position on something over time -- as long as they like the person whose changing his mind. If they like the person, they're "open-minded" and "flexible," "willing to admit they were wrong," etc. If they don't like him, the exact same characteristics are known as "flip-flopping." This isn't just in politics, but is even more noticeable in politics.
Quite true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top