Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-19-2011, 07:53 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,026,245 times
Reputation: 62204

Advertisements

Tonight, I watched the first half hour of The Factor (I'll watch the second half at 11:30P). Bill O'Reilly, Dick Morris, Dennis Miller and Bill Burton (Democrat) all commented on the Romney/Perry debate brouhaha about Romney and illegals. But NONE of them, NONE of the 4 of them, commented on Romney saying "I’m running for office, for Pete’s sake. I can’t have illegals." Yet that opportunism is what the Democrats honed in on, today. Why the omission? Look, they could have taken any side on that "running for office" bit from Romney. They could have mentioned it in terms of how the Democrats responded to the debate, but NO, it wasn't mentioned at all (or it was edited out, can't believe the Burton guy didn't mention it if the DNC already included it in a video). This is why it's just as hard to trust the Republican media as it is the Democrat media. Bias does not just rear its head overtly. It rears its head covertly in what is not said. How do I trust Fox News if they are just as bad as the liberal media in not reporting the whole story?


"Did Mitt Forget?" - YouTube

DNC hits Mitt Romney debate gaffe - Alexander Burns - POLITICO.com

Less-than-honest Romney - The Drum Opinion (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Mitt Romney: "I'm Running for Office, for Pete's Sake! I Can't Have Illegals!" - New York News - Runnin' Scared
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-19-2011, 08:09 PM
 
8,754 posts, read 10,171,305 times
Reputation: 1434
Since Mitt Romney isn't the one that hired illegals in the first place, it's sort of a mute point. This is all old news. Whoever advised Rick Perry to use this should be fired, because if they had done their homework they would have known it was proven without merit last time also.

All this did was open Rick Perry up to even more inspection of his relationships and such concerning illegals in Texas and what he has had to do with employing them. He really shouldn't have gone there with his record.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2011, 09:22 PM
 
2,714 posts, read 4,282,846 times
Reputation: 1314
Illegals are all over the place here in Texas
They build all the homes here

The major home builders... dr horton, drees...etc... all hire 3rd party contractors (who hire illegals) to build homes. By doing it this way, they aren't liable as they didn't hire the illegal directly.

Rick Perry does nothing about it. In fact, he encourages illegal immigration by giving out incentives to illegals who come here. It is kind of funny that Perry was trying to justify that somehow by hiring a 3rd party contractor, Romney hired illegals directly... when in fact, Perry looks the other way all the time when illegal aliens are a concern. Just goes to show what a huge hypocrite Perry is...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2011, 09:42 PM
 
Location: South Dakota
2,608 posts, read 2,098,105 times
Reputation: 769
Obama says "people feel separated from the government" WTF!!!

Please... Id love to feel that 0bomba!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2011, 10:41 PM
 
6,993 posts, read 6,340,548 times
Reputation: 2824
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
Tonight, I watched the first half hour of The Factor (I'll watch the second half at 11:30P). Bill O'Reilly, Dick Morris, Dennis Miller and Bill Burton (Democrat) all commented on the Romney/Perry debate brouhaha about Romney and illegals. But NONE of them, NONE of the 4 of them, commented on Romney saying "I’m running for office, for Pete’s sake. I can’t have illegals." Yet that opportunism is what the Democrats honed in on, today. Why the omission? Look, they could have taken any side on that "running for office" bit from Romney. They could have mentioned it in terms of how the Democrats responded to the debate, but NO, it wasn't mentioned at all (or it was edited out, can't believe the Burton guy didn't mention it if the DNC already included it in a video). This is why it's just as hard to trust the Republican media as it is the Democrat media. Bias does not just rear its head overtly. It rears its head covertly in what is not said. How do I trust Fox News if they are just as bad as the liberal media in not reporting the whole story?

V
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vIwGp8Q3ec]"Did Mitt Forget?" - YouTube[/]

DNC hits Mitt Romney debate gaffe - Alexander Burns - POLITICO.com

Less-than-honest Romney - The Drum Opinion (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Mitt Romney: "I'm Running for Office, for Pete's Sake! I Can't Have Illegals!" - New York News - Runnin' Scared
Jon Stewart covered it on his show...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2011, 10:44 PM
 
6,993 posts, read 6,340,548 times
Reputation: 2824
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiegirl7 View Post
Since Mitt Romney isn't the one that hired illegals in the first place, it's sort of a mute point. This is all old news. Whoever advised Rick Perry to use this should be fired, because if they had done their homework they would have known it was proven without merit last time also.

All this did was open Rick Perry up to even more inspection of his relationships and such concerning illegals in Texas and what he has had to do with employing them. He really shouldn't have gone there with his record.
Not to be snarky here, but for future reference, the word is 'moot' not 'mute'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2011, 10:56 PM
 
8,754 posts, read 10,171,305 times
Reputation: 1434
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1945 View Post
Not to be snarky here, but for future reference, the word is 'moot' not 'mute'.

Really, not snarky...lol. I love when adults correct other adults on a message board.

Last edited by dixiegirl7; 10-19-2011 at 11:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 06:16 AM
 
6,993 posts, read 6,340,548 times
Reputation: 2824
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiegirl7 View Post
Really, not snarky...lol. I love when adults correct other adults on a message board.
You're very welcome. Your error was one of ignorance, not spelling. Even adults can learn new words (well, at least most can ) - consider it my gift to you...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 07:30 AM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,684,460 times
Reputation: 1962
Both have terrible records and if your asking the MEDIA to actually cover things as the Ron Paul people how that is going.

The media want Romeny if they don't get Romeny they will settle for Perry both of them will help the corporate and big government socialist and they are ok with OBama again and they are ok with Cain all of which supported the TARP bailouts!!

You think about it and get back to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,026,245 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiegirl7 View Post
Since Mitt Romney isn't the one that hired illegals in the first place, it's sort of a mute point. This is all old news. Whoever advised Rick Perry to use this should be fired, because if they had done their homework they would have known it was proven without merit last time also.

All this did was open Rick Perry up to even more inspection of his relationships and such concerning illegals in Texas and what he has had to do with employing them. He really shouldn't have gone there with his record.
<sigh> The issue was not ILLEGALS. The issue was Romney taking a position on something just because he's running for office. It backs up his history of flip flopping on assorted issues because he comes not out of conviction but what will get him elected. That's why the Dems latched onto it.

My point was no one doing the Fox News analysis mentioned it when the Democrats were all over it. It's a biased media based on omission illustration and this instance was "my side" doing the same thing the lib networks do.

If Romney is the Republican candidate, the Dem issue will be to kill him on Romneycare if he dares bring up Obamacare and flip flopping over the years on a variety of issues. Fox News (especially Dick Morris whose main schtick is strategy) should be mentioning that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top