Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-05-2008, 10:38 AM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,272,577 times
Reputation: 1124

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 58robbo View Post
they don't want to mention that housing is still too expensive because too many powerful people stand to lose money and POWER if real estate corrects to its REAL market price! i'd venture to say that every major bank is technically insolvent. if commercial and residential real estate falls further not even the fed will be able to bail the banks out. it is for this reason that they're distorting inventory numbers by keeping the majority of their homes off the market.

the conspiracy theorist in me believes that the powers that be want us to take on more debt.
Right. What few people realize but is quite obvious is that the foreclosure sales are the market prices right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-05-2008, 10:43 AM
 
3,283 posts, read 5,214,333 times
Reputation: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by azoria View Post
Who is going to buy a house in the midst of a crumbling job market? What a liability. If your job evaporates and you need to move to find work, owning a home you can't unload is a tombstone. Browse the Michigan forums to see people trapped by homes they can't unload and without jobs.

Michigan now, somewhere else next. This is a good time to be maximizing personal liquidity, preserving the ability to pack up and take off if need be. Buying a home right now, at any kind of price, could be the mistake of a lifetime.
it'd hilarious. i see people who commit to a $500k mortgage. when asked why they say they can easily afford the $3000 a month repayment and for heavensake it's a million dollar home.
i always ask the same questions. what if you lose your job? what if you can't find another job? what if you have to take a big pay cut? how long can you survive on the cash you have?
ofcourse my questions are stupid because this will never happen. the same way the enron and worldcom didn't happen. or the same way that bear stearns, lehmans, wamu, circuit city, gm, ford, chrysler, delta, ....... didn't happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 10:46 AM
 
3,283 posts, read 5,214,333 times
Reputation: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Maybe if the builders went back to some more traditional style homes then prices would come down.
Go look at a late 80's neighborhood. They don't have 3 car garages, media rooms, etc.
They're typical 1700-1800 3/2 homes with simple designs that ARE affordable starter homes.
they won't be able to get their money back. they'll be competing for the same money against homes which cost double.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 10:47 AM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,272,577 times
Reputation: 1124
Quote:
Originally Posted by 58robbo View Post
it'd hilarious. i see people who commit to a $500k mortgage. when asked why they say they can easily afford the $3000 a month repayment and for heavensake it's a million dollar home.
i always ask the same questions. what if you lose your job? what if you can't find another job? what if you have to take a big pay cut? how long can you survive on the cash you have?
ofcourse my questions are stupid because this will never happen. the same way the enron and worldcom didn't happen. or the same way that bear stearns, lehmans, wamu, circuit city, gm, ford, chrysler, delta, ....... didn't happen.
The conventional foolishness has held that mortgage payments are better than rent because it's equity. People even believed it was worth paying a premium to pay a mortgage rather than rent something comparable.

I certainly hope a new collective wisdom will take root - that homeownership is a liability and an expense and is only worthwhile when the risk is justified by paying 30-50% less than comparable rent would be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 10:56 AM
 
3,283 posts, read 5,214,333 times
Reputation: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by tallrick View Post
The reduction of house prices is the biggest fear in the minds of financiers. SO much funny money has been leveraged on inflated home values that reasonable home values would destroy all the new money of the last few years. A collapse of home prices would sweep money from the do nothings and put it back in the pockets of wage earners. Local governments would also suffer as their bloated tax revenues dry up. South Florida is a prime example of this. To this day homes are still extremely overpriced and wages have been falling. It is a disaster in the making. The funny money people have to keep pumping or they will have to actually do meaningful work. That cannot happen.

most people don't understand this. govco would like people to believe that the small guy has the most to lose. this simply isn't true. the big guys are the ones who stand to lose serious bread. what they don't tell people is that without bailouts the $500k home becomes worth $100k or less. so we earn less but things cost less. we can't afford the battery operated pepper shakers but we work only half the hours. tptb want us on that treadmill!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 11:09 AM
 
1,989 posts, read 4,471,377 times
Reputation: 1401
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Maybe if the builders went back to some more traditional style homes then prices would come down.
Go look at a late 80's neighborhood. They don't have 3 car garages, media rooms, etc.
They're typical 1700-1800 3/2 homes with simple designs that ARE affordable starter homes.
Put in energy efficient design/appliances and I'd buy that in a heartbeat. Not just for starters, for keeps. I don't need or want to take care of anything much larger. Wish they would build smart homes instead of fancy ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 11:15 AM
 
1,989 posts, read 4,471,377 times
Reputation: 1401
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuSuSushi View Post
Good god, if I could swing it responsibly, I'd be out there tomorrow bidding on three or four that I know about. At the very least, I'll be able to work one or two into my budget without worries by this time next year.
I honestly think this is part of the problem. Right now there are too many investors/speculators still trying to game this diseased market. I'll take it as a good sign when I see that the majority of homes purchased are bought by people who WANT TO LIVE IN THEM.

Wish I could get a chart showing the historical proportion of homes sold to investors/speculators. My instinct is we were way out of whack and still are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 11:26 AM
 
3,762 posts, read 5,433,926 times
Reputation: 4833
Quote:
Originally Posted by azoria View Post
Who is going to buy a house in the midst of a crumbling job market? What a liability. If your job evaporates and you need to move to find work, owning a home you can't unload is a tombstone. Browse the Michigan forums to see people trapped by homes they can't unload and without jobs.

Michigan now, somewhere else next. This is a good time to be maximizing personal liquidity, preserving the ability to pack up and take off if need be. Buying a home right now, at any kind of price, could be the mistake of a lifetime.
I was ridiculed for saying the same thing in the Real Estate forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 11:33 AM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,272,577 times
Reputation: 1124
Quote:
Originally Posted by trishguard View Post
I was ridiculed for saying the same thing in the Real Estate forum.
Welcome to the more intelligent side...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,876,922 times
Reputation: 24863
Speculators welcome, and even create, inflation. They make money in an inflating market. They do not welcome deflation. They lose and lose big when prices are collapsing. I figure I will be able to buy a much better home in five years than I could ever afford during the bubble.

I do not think government intervention with all the bailouts will result in more inflation. It will just delay the deflation until the big boys can get out. Keep your current jobs and hang onto your houses. If you sell now you will be unable to recover your losses for a decade or more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top