Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Best sports city?
New York 24 8.54%
Los Angeles 12 4.27%
Baltimore / Washington 2 0.71%
San Francisco 8 2.85%
Chicago 33 11.74%
Boston 41 14.59%
Dallas 20 7.12%
Philadelphia 38 13.52%
Atlanta 6 2.14%
Miami 1 0.36%
Detroit 9 3.20%
Phoenix 3 1.07%
Minneappolis 4 1.42%
Denver 11 3.91%
Cleveland 7 2.49%
St. Louis 12 4.27%
Houston 7 2.49%
Tampa Bay 1 0.36%
Pittsburgh 17 6.05%
San Diego 1 0.36%
Seattle 3 1.07%
Charlotte 3 1.07%
Cincinnati 2 0.71%
Kansas City 0 0%
Indianapolis 4 1.42%
Milwaukee 1 0.36%
Nashville 2 0.71%
Buffalo 4 1.42%
New Orleans 1 0.36%
Other (post it) 4 1.42%
Voters: 281. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2015, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Watching half my country turn into Gilead
3,530 posts, read 4,183,105 times
Reputation: 2925

Advertisements

I had such a hard time reading that article, on two separate devices. Constantly kept crashing. Any one else have that problem?

Agree that Boston is way too high. The Pats have pretty mediocre jerseys--not terrible, but nothing to write home about, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2015, 08:52 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 2,112,822 times
Reputation: 1036
I saw that ranking thing last week and didn't understand how the Warriors jersey got like a 7 or something and some other Bay Area teams got 10s when the Warriors jersey is widely considered to be the best in the league currently and the The City jersey is considered one of the best uniforms ever across all sports. For the record, I think declaring something like a uniform to be the best is pretty ridiculous similar to labeling a restaurant the best in the world.. but still.

On my phone so don't feel like citing a million webpages but here is 1 I read during the finals:

Lukas: NBA Finals pit teams with historic best, worst uniforms

Quote:
1. Best. Jersey. Ever. Beginning with the 1966-67 season, the Warriors wore what's now widely regarded as history's greatest basketball uniform -- the fabled "The City" design. What made it so great? The gorgeous depiction of the Golden Gate Bridge on the front, the spectacular cable car motif for the uniform numbers on the back, and of course the odd use of "The City" on the upper chest. It was nonsensical but somehow felt just right. Like, which city? You know -- the city. Still the best basketball uniform ever (and of course it's also the basis for the Warriors' current jersey design, which features a stylized depiction of the Bay Bridge).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,740 posts, read 5,526,714 times
Reputation: 5978
NFL Team Values 2015 - In Photos: NFL Team Values 2015 - Forbes

According to Forbes, the Dallas Cowboys are now the most valuable team in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,299 posts, read 6,076,242 times
Reputation: 9653
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
NFL Team Values 2015 - In Photos: NFL Team Values 2015 - Forbes

According to Forbes, the Dallas Cowboys are now the most valuable team in the world.

They actually have been for quite a few years I believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,740 posts, read 5,526,714 times
Reputation: 5978
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjlo View Post
They actually have been for quite a few years I believe.
Forbes Announces The World's Most Valuable Sports Teams

Dallas was just behind Real Madrid up until they released updated numbers today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 11:58 AM
 
1,526 posts, read 1,988,481 times
Reputation: 1529
The Minneapolis - St. Paul area continually supports its mediocre (at best) professional and college sports teams. The area has the NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA, WNBA, D-1 sports, and soon will have MLS. Since moving to Minneapolis, the teams have a been a major disappointment BUT the organizations and college teams have been able to get new stadiums built. I don't understand the support for such sh*tty organizations. That being said, Minneapolis has to be ranked pretty high for supporting all it's crappy professional and D-1 teams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 01:57 PM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,535,461 times
Reputation: 2987
It's definitely not Minny - sorry. Compare Green Bay (population 100,000, 30 year waiting list, no blackouts for a lifetime) with the Vikings. And yes, there was a time (1970s) when the Vikings were great and the Packers were terrible. During that time, people still filled Lambeau.

Milwaukee, much smaller than the Twin Cities with a far worse baseball team historically, outdrew the Twins last year (hit the "Attendance" arrow) by over half a million people: 2014 Major League Baseball Attendance & Miscellaneous | Baseball-Reference.com

While neither did well (Bucks have the worst arena in the NBA but has a new one on the horizon), the Bucks outdrew the Timberwolves, even though the Bucks had the worst record in the NBA the previous year ('wolves had the 2nd worst attendance in the NBA): 2014-2015 NBA Attendance - National Basketball Association - ESPN

This is not illustrating that the WI teams are the answer on this thread, though the Packers should be up there and the Brewers draw top 10 in baseball's smallest market, but to show how poorly the Twin Cities support their sports.

What about hockey, where MN is the center of the universe according to most locals? 8th place last year, after Washington and Calgary: 2014-2015 NHL Attendance - National Hockey League - ESPN

Many would say it's a good thing that Minnesotans are concerned with other things, but it's definitely not a "big sports city."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,517 posts, read 33,569,529 times
Reputation: 12157
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanismEverywhere View Post
Chicago
Philadelphia
New York
Boston

When the Bruins and Celtics need championships to sell out, excuse me if I consider their ranking a little dubious.

Boston gets unprecedented media and social media coverage because of their 9 titles in 15 years so they get a ton of exposure. Just because your team wins a lot doesn't mean they have the best fans or are the best sports city.

What about cities like Philadelphia or Buffalo that never win and sell out?

Sorry Boston. You're diehard for the Red Sox but bandwagon for the Patriots, Bruins and Celtics. Everyone knows its true but nobody ever talks about it.
I mean it's not like Philadelphia greatly sell out all their teams. The Sixers attendance is woeful and the Phillies went back to below average due to their struggles. No city honestly is perfect in this across the board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 04:32 PM
 
1,526 posts, read 1,988,481 times
Reputation: 1529
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
It's definitely not Minny - sorry. Compare Green Bay (population 100,000, 30 year waiting list, no blackouts for a lifetime) with the Vikings. And yes, there was a time (1970s) when the Vikings were great and the Packers were terrible. During that time, people still filled Lambeau.
The ONLY reason why Green Bay has a team is because the city owns the Packers. Had the city not owned the team, the Packers would have been gone long ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
Milwaukee, much smaller than the Twin Cities with a far worse baseball team historically, outdrew the Twins last year (hit the "Attendance" arrow) by over half a million people: 2014 Major League Baseball Attendance & Miscellaneous | Baseball-Reference.com
The Twins organization was handed a brand new baseball park, which opened in 2010 and the team went 94-68. Since then they have had four straight years of 90+ losses. Obviously attendance is going to be down, BUT they still manage to draw 2 - 3 million each year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
While neither did well (Bucks have the worst arena in the NBA but has a new one on the horizon), the Bucks outdrew the Timberwolves, even though the Bucks had the worst record in the NBA the previous year ('wolves had the 2nd worst attendance in the NBA): 2014-2015 NBA Attendance - National Basketball Association - ESPN
T-wolves are awful. I'm surprised they are still around.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
What about hockey, where MN is the center of the universe according to most locals? 8th place last year, after Washington and Calgary: 2014-2015 NHL Attendance - National Hockey League - ESPN
Well, Minnesota, specifically the Minneapolis metropolitan area produces the most NHL talent and supports an NHL team, two D-1 hockey teams within its CSA, and the best high school hockey in the country so, yeah the Minneapolis area is pretty much the center of hockey in the US. As far as the Wild's attendance is concerned, the Xcel was at 106% capacity last year and looking at the previous 9 years: 103.1%, 104.7%, 98.4%, 99.7%, 101.9%, 102.8%, 102.8%, 102.7% and over 100%. In other words, you don't know what you are talking about when it comes to hockey.

BTW, I can't stand the Wild - their logo, their colors, their style of hockey, etc... BUT people support them even when they are bad, which has been often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2015, 10:55 AM
 
44 posts, read 51,711 times
Reputation: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
I mean it's not like Philadelphia greatly sell out all their teams. The Sixers attendance is woeful and the Phillies went back to below average due to their struggles. No city honestly is perfect in this across the board.

Sixers attendance being bad is understandable. The Celtics and Bruins is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top