Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The following city has the greatest influence on the rest of the U.S.A...
New York City 502 68.30%
Los Angeles 233 31.70%
Voters: 735. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2009, 09:50 PM
 
2,957 posts, read 6,480,697 times
Reputation: 1419

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nycricanpapi View Post
somebody's getting offended......
Not necessarily...only if you were calling me a hater or saying I was hating on NYC, since I speak in favor of it quite often. I'm only checking b/c you said that in response to a quote that was responding to me. So I hope you're not talking about me, which you very well may not have been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2009, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (wilshire/westwood)
804 posts, read 2,403,712 times
Reputation: 379
Default From Hollywood LA gets crowded


YouTube - Michael Jackson Star on Hollywood Walk Of



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98QUB...aynext_from=RL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:02 PM
 
2,957 posts, read 6,480,697 times
Reputation: 1419
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCal Nature View Post
To me it's both, but really it depends which coast you live on.
I agree with that. NYC is most likely the most influential across the nation, but from out here in CA it really doesn't seem like it is in many ways. That's why I think the opinions of people from places other than CA and NY count for more in this debate.

And I'm talking about influencing more aspects of American culture throughout the rest of the nation, not how much history or how many single contributions each city might have made altogether. NYC for example has tons of characteristics about it that do not necessarily escape the confines of its city limits or the Northeast. So, hypothetically speaking, to a NYer it may seem that NYC accounts for 90% of American culture while elsewhere it might not seem quite as influential.

I think NYC is more dominant than LA in more real life areas like finance, the UN, and news networks, while LA is equal or arguably more influential in pop culture and innovation. All of these factors (and more) influence us all, and some people are more effected by pop culture than Wall Street and vice versa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (wilshire/westwood)
804 posts, read 2,403,712 times
Reputation: 379
Default More videos of Hollywood madness


YouTube - Mourners at Michael Jackson star on Hollywood Walk of Fame ... by GloZell and SK

Hollywood

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hTS1KaK...le&gl=US&hl=en
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:17 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,207 posts, read 39,488,121 times
Reputation: 21303
There's also the problem of where we draw the line for LA. I'm not so hesitant to put enclaves (Beverly Hills) or municipalities almost completely surrounded by LA (Santa Monica, Marina Del Rey), but places that just border (or not even that) being counted seems a bit of a stretch. Places such as Pasadena (the San Gabriel Valley in general), Long Beach, and Anaheim are not only their own separate municipalities but also have their own identities. At this point, it becomes a debate about their metros--which would also go to NYC.

Michael Jackson, really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:23 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (wilshire/westwood)
804 posts, read 2,403,712 times
Reputation: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
There's also the problem of where we draw the line for LA. I'm not so hesitant to put enclaves (Beverly Hills) or municipalities almost completely surrounded by LA (Santa Monica, Marina Del Rey), but places that just border (or not even that) being counted seems a bit of a stretch. Places such as Pasadena (the San Gabriel Valley in general), Long Beach, and Anaheim are not only their own separate municipalities but also have their own identities. At this point, it becomes a debate about their metros--which would also go to NYC.

Michael Jackson, really?
Yes really to broadcast that LA is a international tourist hotspot and Long Beach and Pasadena and Anaheim go under the name Los Angeles. They have no ID it's all LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:27 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,207 posts, read 39,488,121 times
Reputation: 21303
Yea, it's like people living in Westchester or north Jersey saying they're from NYC. It's a lot easier for people to handle, but it's not true and doesn't fly with the natives. I'm from the San Gabriel Valley. I was mostly raised there. I wouldn't say it's LA unless it was to someone that I assume wouldn't know any better and doesn't want an extra sentence or two of explanation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:37 PM
 
1 posts, read 1,775,443 times
Reputation: 10
New York is the most influential city in the WORLD, IMO.

Los Angeles is weak compared to New York City...no comparison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Spain
1,854 posts, read 4,926,302 times
Reputation: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Yea, it's like people living in Westchester or north Jersey saying they're from NYC. It's a lot easier for people to handle, but it's not true and doesn't fly with the natives. I'm from the San Gabriel Valley. I was mostly raised there. I wouldn't say it's LA unless it was to someone that I assume wouldn't know any better and doesn't want an extra sentence or two of explanation.
People who are from Long Island or northern New Jersey want you to know they're from Long Island or New Jersey. People from Pasadena or Burbank just say they're from L.A.

Similarly, from what I hear there's a distinct cultural divide from Manhattan/Yonkers/Long Island, etc. Los Angeles county pretty much has the same identity throughout, you often drive through many cities without ever knowing you've left Los Angeles. The cultural/identity divide in L.A. doesn't occur until you go into the O.C.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:45 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,207 posts, read 39,488,121 times
Reputation: 21303
The divide isn't big when you hit the borders of the outer boroughs. Are those areas distinct from Manhattan? Certainly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top