Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-14-2014, 12:08 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,186,892 times
Reputation: 14762

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Folks3000 View Post
Percentages aren't as telling as actual population gains. If a city of 50 grows by 50 it can lead in percentages.
These are all metros over a million but point well taken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2014, 12:13 PM
 
Location: Cincinnati(Silverton)
1,606 posts, read 2,841,815 times
Reputation: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austincool View Post
A new report released by Bloomberg:

Fastest growing metros
1. Austin - 5.4%
2. Raleigh - 3.7%
3. San Antonio - 3.2%
4. Denver - 2.9%
5. Charlotte - 2.6%
6. Nashville - 2.6%
7. Oklahoma City - 2.6%
8. Orlando - 2.3%
9. Houston - 2.1%
10. Dallas 2.1%

Memphis, Chicago, Birmingham, Hampton Roads, New York, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Detroit, and a few others are among metros that lost population.
What? This is not true. Maybe for Cleveland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 12:15 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,186,892 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austincool View Post
A new report released by Bloomberg:

Fastest growing metros
1. Austin - 5.4%
2. Raleigh - 3.7%
3. San Antonio - 3.2%
4. Denver - 2.9%
5. Charlotte - 2.6%
6. Nashville - 2.6%
7. Oklahoma City - 2.6%
8. Orlando - 2.3%
9. Houston - 2.1%
10. Dallas 2.1%

Memphis, Chicago, Birmingham, Hampton Roads, New York, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Detroit, and a few others are among metros that lost population.
To clarify, those are just domestic migration numbers, not total growth rates. Many metros are still growing via immigration and birthrate.
Austin or Bust: America's Biggest Cities Lose People to the Urban B-List - Businessweek
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 12:44 PM
 
1,940 posts, read 3,567,816 times
Reputation: 2121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Folks3000 View Post
Here are the MSA growth per year for those:
Austin: +89,050
Phoenix: +68,324
San Antonio: +45,748
San Diego: +40,875
Tampa: +29,818

2050 MSA projection:
Phoenix: 6,925,827
Austin: 5,278,269
San Diego: 4,730,313
Tampa: 3,975,943
San Antonio: 3,972,408

(Again, take projections with a grain of salt, for example rising prices and COL in Texas cities or Phoenix may put the brakes on high growth over time)
That is really interesting! I'm betting though that Austin's growth will not outpace San Antonio's. San Antonio is building the infrastructure to handle greater population than Austin. Also! Austin isn't the hot mecca it used to be in terms of future movers. I used to hear a lot about Austin when I moved from TX to LA, but now I'm hearing more and more about San Antonio being the new hot place for middle class family affordability. I've even met a few people heading that way once the year closes out and they sell their overpriced LA homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,414,300 times
Reputation: 5369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austincool View Post
A new report released by Bloomberg:

Fastest growing metros
1. Austin - 5.4%
2. Raleigh - 3.7%
3. San Antonio - 3.2%
4. Denver - 2.9%
5. Charlotte - 2.6%
6. Nashville - 2.6%
7. Oklahoma City - 2.6%
8. Orlando - 2.3%
9. Houston - 2.1%
10. Dallas 2.1%

Memphis, Chicago, Birmingham, Hampton Roads, New York, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Detroit, and a few others are among metros that lost population.
You are misreading the data. It is only about domestic migration and doesn't take into account international migration and natural population increase. NYC metro and Chicagoland metro haven't ever declined in population by any census measure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2014, 09:18 PM
 
624 posts, read 907,393 times
Reputation: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8to32characters View Post
Cities that derive the majority of their water supply from the Ogallala Aquifer (e.g., Austin, San Antonio, Dallas, OKC, et al.) are in big trouble, even more so than the cities that draw their water from the Colorado River (e.g., L.A., S.D., Phoenix, L.V., etc.), as the Ogallala is really in dire shape. I can't see this issue improving in the future either, esp. considering Austin, San Antonio, Dallas, OKC, et al. are currently among the fastest growing cities in the US and desalination seems like a less than optimal solution than for those cities compared to, say, cities in coastal California.



SAWS News: SAWS Kicks Off Brackish Desalination Project

http://www.bexarwitness.com/saws-beg...-bexar-county/


San Antonio and I'm sure other sunbelt cities are not just sitting around wring their hands, but working on solutions for the future.

Last edited by BillyH; 05-06-2014 at 09:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 03:37 AM
 
1,064 posts, read 1,906,001 times
Reputation: 322
Those numbers are way off
Dallas is at 7.2million right now and to tell me that in 36 years it will only have 12 million klamo!
I believed that it will be around 17 million people because Dallas has alot of room to grow and the other metro areas that are near Dallas like Tyler/Longview to the east which is about 500,000 and cities to the north and south not to much east of Fortworth is major but Dallas.Dallas will have well over 12 million and Houston being close to the golden triangle will have more then the numbers show because Houston is a city that believes in annexing lol.People in my area always joke on how in the next 30 years Houston will be knocking at Nacogdoches/Lufkin area door.My question is how did L.A. take off from the fastest growing metro areas with over 20 million lol really!:c ool:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 03:43 AM
 
1,064 posts, read 1,906,001 times
Reputation: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Folks3000 View Post
Here are the MSA growth per year for those:
Austin: +89,050
Phoenix: +68,324
San Antonio: +45,748
San Diego: +40,875
Tampa: +29,818

2050 MSA projection:
Phoenix: 6,925,827
Austin: 5,278,269
San Diego: 4,730,313
Tampa: 3,975,943
San Antonio: 3,972,408

(Again, take projections with a grain of salt, for example rising prices and COL in Texas cities or Phoenix may put the brakes on high growth over time)
San Antonio and Austin are not light years away from each other but light seconds with New brunfels and San Marcus in between.San Antonio and Austin will be joined by 2050 making the numbers be around 10 million being larger then hot lanta lol klamo ok clam down Dee!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top