Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would never buy anything from Chrysler or GM. Both companies make some great looking cars especially the Challenger. I just can't get over the whole buyout thing.
Any owners out there of the dodge charger srt 392, who could shed some pros and cons on this car. I'm thinking about a used 2013 or 2014. I currently own a 2011 mustang 5.0 GT and I love it still, its a fun to drive car. However, I cant get this 392 out of my system. This is the only charger I would really be interested in, love the challenger 392 also but lean toward the charger.
I would never buy anything from Chrysler or GM. Both companies make some great looking cars especially the Challenger. I just can't get over the whole buyout thing.
Well than down have a bank account because they were bailed out buy the govt. also.
just checking to see if anyone on this forum owns a dodge charger srt8 2012 and up with the 6.4 liter engine, 470 hp and 470 lb-ft. the gas mileage sucks and you have to pay a gas guzzler tax when bought new. performance wise I have read a lot of good reviews for such s big car and it holds its own with the mustang gt and Camaro ss . please share your info, thoughts, or experience . I like this car but they are expensive new, I wouldn't want to put that much money in it. but I can see myself in a used one a few years down the road.
It's a muscle car. It's nice. A corvette of the same year will abuse it like a redheaded stepchild. It really is about the only true "Muscle Car" out there, though. The Shelby and ZL1 would qualify, but they actually hook, and are smaller. The 6.4 Charger/Challenger's are about smoking tires and hooning around. They are also...big.
I would never buy anything from Chrysler or GM. Both companies make some great looking cars especially the Challenger. I just can't get over the whole buyout thing.
That's great, bravo, but why *********rself? You pay taxes? Good on you! Me, too. Guess what? You and I both have invested money in those companies. Like it...or not. Dead is dead, put the biscuit in the basket. Right? So why would you want your investment to fail? That's about like jumping out of a car doing 90 because you dislike that it's painted red. Makes no sense. Reminds me of those people who hate Obama and "can't wait for the country to fall into civil war/famine/etc. so people know that they were right!" Derp?
After driving a Charger for 2 years and now driving a Challenger all I can say is the latter is more suited for me and just flat out looks better.
Whoever redesigned the 2015 Dodge ChargerDart needs to be terminated... So ugly.
Hey, I'm sure the Charger is a great car and goes like a raped ape. But to call a sedan a Charger is just wrong. They just don't get it, they don't understand what the Charger meant to young people back in the day. Performance, coolness, freedom from your parents. Not 2 extra doors for groceries and kids.
There would have been nothing wrong with calling that car the Polara if they insisted on a retro name. Polara GT sounds cool IMO.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Follow Up On 2012 And Up Charger SRT 392
