Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2013, 04:14 PM
 
2,918 posts, read 4,207,367 times
Reputation: 1527

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorielicious View Post
What major city is more segregated than Chicago?
By this list's definition NYC, Newark (if you consider that a "major city"), Detroit and Milwaukee. By some lists' definitions, nobody.

I have to say I see their point with Detroit and arguably Milwaukee, but not with NYC. Looking at the maps, NYC at least has some major areas (entire boroughs, even) that are very mixed in a way that only a few small neighborhoods are in Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2013, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,976,447 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorielicious View Post
What major city is more segregated than Chicago?
Did you even read the list?

Newark
Milwaukee
New York
Detroit

In that order are all more segregated than Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2013, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
928 posts, read 1,713,441 times
Reputation: 1298
Oh, because I always thought Chicago was the most segregated. And before anyone gripes about the HuffPo link, full report here.

Edited: Yes, I looked at the link (thanks for asking!) and it's old, btw. Well not the link itself, but the data and the maps. They've actually been discussed in this very forum before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2013, 04:20 PM
 
3,004 posts, read 5,150,626 times
Reputation: 1547
There's segregation of jim crow and there's segregation of today. Jim crow was literally forcing groups to live in certain areas just because which was bad. Today's segregation runs mainly along economic lines with legacy jim crow thrown in which isn't always good but not always bad either. It all depends on the natural migration of given city. Chicago is slowly breaking that with the black community as more of the populous moves into the middle class. As a kid, didn't matter, you lived in the hood, middle class or not. Wasn't much of a choice back then. Over time the city's dynamic will change in a new natural progression based off of economic similarity and not race.

Areas with natural migration patterns probably won't change much. Indy wont change much. It's migration is just north. Approx 250k people actually live south of washington st and that will continue. Granted being black in indy and living south was a no no in indiana and that perception hasn't changed nor has some of the realities of racism on the sw and se sides. Once you're north everyone lives everywhere and you'll find one of everyone on each block most of the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2013, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Chicago - Logan Square
3,396 posts, read 7,211,251 times
Reputation: 3731
Segregation is difficult to define and quantify, and this example is a pretty poor attempt.

A good example of the problem of quantifying segregation is that any listing gives a pass to cities that have no diversity whatsoever. Where's Salt Lake City, Burlington Vt, or Pittsburgh on this list?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2013, 04:31 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,923,075 times
Reputation: 7419
By the way, the segregation from this article is about black-white segregation only...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2013, 04:34 PM
 
2,421 posts, read 4,318,724 times
Reputation: 1479
Quote:
Originally Posted by msamhunter View Post
There's segregation of jim crow and there's segregation of today. Jim crow was literally forcing groups to live in certain areas just because which was bad. Today's segregation runs mainly along economic lines with legacy jim crow thrown in which isn't always good but not always bad either. It all depends on the natural migration of given city. Chicago is slowly breaking that with the black community as more of the populous moves into the middle class. As a kid, didn't matter, you lived in the hood, middle class or not. Wasn't much of a choice back then. Over time the city's dynamic will change in a new natural progression based off of economic similarity and not race.

Areas with natural migration patterns probably won't change much. Indy wont change much. It's migration is just north. Approx 250k people actually live south of washington st and that will continue. Granted being black in indy and living south was a no no in indiana and that perception hasn't changed nor has some of the realities of racism on the sw and se sides. Once you're north everyone lives everywhere and you'll find one of everyone on each block most of the time.
I agree ! Segregation by race is slowly but surely starting to improve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2013, 07:11 PM
 
190 posts, read 315,377 times
Reputation: 314
while chicago might be the 5th worst according to that list, i don't see anywhere in any of those other cities that are as diverse as certain northside neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2013, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Chicago(Northside)
3,678 posts, read 7,216,052 times
Reputation: 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broadrippleguy View Post
Agreed.
Chicago has nothing to brag about with regards to Segregation and crime. it would be foolish to suggest otherwise.
smh...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2013, 09:59 PM
 
2,918 posts, read 4,207,367 times
Reputation: 1527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attrill View Post
A good example of the problem of quantifying segregation is that any listing gives a pass to cities that have no diversity whatsoever. Where's Salt Lake City, Burlington Vt, or Pittsburgh on this list?
Pittsburgh is #18 on the list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top