Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2012, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,328,279 times
Reputation: 6658

Advertisements

Barry Larkin gets in with 84% of the votes. Good for Barry. Certainly deserving.

Jack Morris receives 67% of the votes, and will be eligible for the 14th time next year. He doesn't deserve it.

Jeff Bagwell, probably the best player eligible, gets 56% of the votes. He'll be eligible again.

Mark McGuire gets 20% in his 6th try.

Tim Raines, who probably deserves in, comes up with 49% of the votes

1 person voted for Eric Young.

0 votes for: Jeromy Burnitz, Brian Jordan, Terry Muholland, Phil Nevin, Ruben Sierra, or Tony Womack
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2012, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Mequon, WI
8,295 posts, read 23,140,212 times
Reputation: 5700
Bill Mueller got just four votes and will be dropped in future years, along with Juan Gonzalez (23) and Vinny Castilla (six) and EY? why did Pedro Gomez vote for EY? "because he thought he was a good guy and he liked him" Pedro Gomez= knob

OK the nobs who voted for Mueller, Juan and Vinny Should have their credentials ripped away and I know what it is, there is a code among baseball writers to vote for guys who they know won't get into the HOF, they do this to show respect for "good guys" and guys that played the game the right way. It happens every year and sometime enough of them do this and you have Orlando Cepeda getting in and tainting the HOF. Like I said it currently has 297 members and could be stricken down to 150-200. It should be the best of the best not the good- very good players.

MLB: 25 Players Who Should Not Be in the Baseball Hall of Fame | Bleacher Report

Morris doesn't deserve it neither does Bagwell(roids). I don't know how you can even consider a guy who didn't BA at least .300 maybe .320 I am not saying this is the end all be all stat but to prevent Cooperstown from becoming Canton where anyone is elected. Just my thoughts, and I am out on a island but I am not running from the fact that maybe half of the people should not be in the HOF.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,171,424 times
Reputation: 21239
In terms of the structure of the voting, Larkin capitalized on a window which is going to be shut for a number of years. Candidates who have been around for multiple elections are now going to be shoved to the backburner by a host of mega stars becoming eligible. The class of 2013 will feature not only the three poster boys for 'roids, Clemens, Bonds and Sosa, but also will have heavyweights Mike Piazza, Craig Biggio and Curt Schilling. In 2014 Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Frank Thomas, Mike Mussina and Jeff Kent will appear for the first time. 2015 will yield John Smoltz, Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez, Gary Sheffield, Nomar Garciaparra and Carlos Delgado.

That is seven first ballot types (Piazza, Biggio, Maddux, Glavine, Thomas, Johnson and Martinez) and five or six who will be drawing more votes in the next several elections than anyone in the returning class with the possible exception of Bagwell.

In 2012, Larkin was free of any outstanding newcomers or outrageously overlooked retunees as competition. He dived through that window. No one else who was in today's election is going to get enshrined for at least four or five years, probably longer. Anyone whose eligibility expires during that time, such as Jack Morris, can kiss their writer election chances goodbye and start cozying up to the Vet Committee members.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Long Island,New York
8,164 posts, read 15,160,322 times
Reputation: 2534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
In terms of the structure of the voting, Larkin capitalized on a window which is going to be shut for a number of years. Candidates who have been around for multiple elections are now going to be shoved to the backburner by a host of mega stars becoming eligible. The class of 2013 will feature not only the three poster boys for 'roids, Clemens, Bonds and Sosa, but also will have heavyweights Mike Piazza, Craig Biggio and Curt Schilling. In 2014 Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Frank Thomas, Mike Mussina and Jeff Kent will appear for the first time. 2015 will yield John Smoltz, Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez, Gary Sheffield, Nomar Garciaparra and Carlos Delgado.

That is seven first ballot types (Piazza, Biggio, Maddux, Glavine, Thomas, Johnson and Martinez) and five or six who will be drawing more votes in the next several elections than anyone in the returning class with the possible exception of Bagwell.

In 2012, Larkin was free of any outstanding newcomers or outrageously overlooked retunees as competition. He dived through that window. No one else who was in today's election is going to get enshrined for at least four or five years, probably longer. Anyone whose eligibility expires during that time, such as Jack Morris, can kiss their writer election chances goodbye and start cozying up to the Vet Committee members.
Sorry but Schilling is no heavyweight. Early in his career he was nothing to brag about. Not until later on did he excel. If you let him in, then you have to put Bernie Williams in based on a long consistent career and Mattingly who also excelled for a number of years until the back injuries ate him up. Piazza is another one. Guy was a great hitter then he was a guy who could only hit the long ball. His defense was horrible. So you pretty much had a DH behind the plate with one of the worst ratios of throwing out runners. If you let him in, then Edgar Martinez should be in. Jack Morris was a smart pitcher and his ERA is deceiving. With big leads he would throw strikes and not worry about working the corners. He became an extreme contact pitcher and allowed the game to speed up. He also could eat innings better than most I have seen.


http://www.baseball-reference.com/pl...chilcu01.shtml
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,328,279 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancet71 View Post
Sorry but Schilling is no heavyweight. Early in his career he was nothing to brag about. Not until later on did he excel.
Woah!

Curt Schilling produced 86 WAR in his career.

From 1960 to 2011 5 pitchers had more WAR. Those pitchers:
Roger Clemens, Greg Maddux, Randy Johnson, Nolan Ryan and Pedro Martinez.

Now, all of those guys besides Martinez pitched substantially more innings. If we look at WAR per 250 innings we get:
Martinez 7.9
Clemens 7.4
Johnson 6.9
Schilling 6.6
Maddux 6.0
Ryan 4.3

Quote:
If you let him in, then you have to put Bernie Williams in based on a long consistent career
Nope.
Schilling 86 WAR
Bernie 48 WAR

Schilling had the 5th most WAR amongst pitchers since 1960
Bernie had the 21st most WAR amongst CFers since 1960

Quote:
and Mattingly who also excelled for a number of years until the back injuries ate him up.
Nope.
Mattingly 46 career WAR. 32nd amongst 1Bmen between 1960 and 2011.


Quote:
Piazza is another one. Guy was a great hitter then he was a guy who could only hit the long ball. His defense was horrible. So you pretty much had a DH behind the plate with one of the worst ratios of throwing out runners.
We've already discussed this

Piazza is 7th ALL TIME in WAR for catchers with 66.7
He's 1st ALL TIME in offense for catchers with 425 batting runs.
He's 2nd to last ALL TIME (Ed Taubensee is worse) with negative 63 fielding runs.

Johnny Bench, the best catcher of all time (81.5 WAR) was worth
302 batting runs and 71 fielding runs

Major League Leaderboards » 2011 » Catchers » WAR Statistics | FanGraphs Baseball

Piazza's hitting was THAT good.

Quote:
If you let him in, then Edgar Martinez should be in.
Martinez has 70 career WAR. He's generally considered on the cusp

Quote:
Jack Morris was a smart pitcher and his ERA is deceiving. With big leads he would throw strikes and not worry about working the corners. He became an extreme contact pitcher and allowed the game to speed up. He also could eat innings better than most I have seen.
This is one of the biggest myths in baseball.

Baseball Prospectus | The Jack Morris Project

For his career:
With a lead of 4 or more runs Morris gave up 4.30 runs per 9 innings
With a lead of -3 to 3 runs Morris gave up 4.23 runs per 9 innings
Where's the evidence?

And before you go off on 'stats', read the article that I posted

Last edited by filihok; 01-09-2012 at 10:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2012, 10:50 AM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,682,569 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancet71 View Post
Sorry but Schilling is no heavyweight. Early in his career he was nothing to brag about. Not until later on did he excel. If you let him in, then you have to put Bernie Williams in based on a long consistent career and Mattingly who also excelled for a number of years until the back injuries ate him up. Piazza is another one. Guy was a great hitter then he was a guy who could only hit the long ball. His defense was horrible. So you pretty much had a DH behind the plate with one of the worst ratios of throwing out runners. If you let him in, then Edgar Martinez should be in. Jack Morris was a smart pitcher and his ERA is deceiving. With big leads he would throw strikes and not worry about working the corners. He became an extreme contact pitcher and allowed the game to speed up. He also could eat innings better than most I have seen.


Curt Schilling Statistics and History - Baseball-Reference.com
Piazza is the best hitting catcher of all time. Piazza is in without a doubt. Piazza and Edgar Martinez shouldn't even be spoken of in the same sentance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2012, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,328,279 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdm2008 View Post
Piazza is the best hitting catcher of all time. Piazza is in without a doubt. Piazza and Edgar Martinez shouldn't even be spoken of in the same sentance.


They are actually very similar hitters.

Quote:
OBP
Piazza .377
Martinez .418

SLG
Piazza .545
Martinez .515

wOBA (measures total offense)
Piazza .389
Martinez .405

wRC+ (measures offense relative to the league average)
Piazza 140 (40% better than average)
Martinez 148 (48% better than average)

Batting Runs
Piazza 425
Martinez 568
But, Martinez was a better hitter than Piazza.

Of course, Piazza was a catcher and Martinez was a DH. We can factor in their defensive contributions.

Positional Runs + Fielding Runs
Piazza 85+(-63) = 22
Martinez -150 + 16 = -134

Then we can find out which player was the most productive overall.

Piazza 690 runs above replacement
Martinez 707 runs above replacement

17 runs over 16-18 seasons is a virtual tie.

Piazza was an absolute beast with a 9+ WAR season, a 7+ WAR season and 4 6+ WAR seasons while Martinez was more consistent with 1 7+ WAR season and 5 6+ WAR seasons.

Better shown with graphs from FanGraphs!



You can see that Piazza had the steeper graph with more 'big' seasons, but Martinez' graph was flatter indicating more consistency.



But, in the end, almost identical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2012, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Cook County
5,289 posts, read 7,501,218 times
Reputation: 3105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
In terms of the structure of the voting, Larkin capitalized on a window which is going to be shut for a number of years. Candidates who have been around for multiple elections are now going to be shoved to the backburner by a host of mega stars becoming eligible. The class of 2013 will feature not only the three poster boys for 'roids, Clemens, Bonds and Sosa, but also will have heavyweights Mike Piazza, Craig Biggio and Curt Schilling. In 2014 Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Frank Thomas, Mike Mussina and Jeff Kent will appear for the first time. 2015 will yield John Smoltz, Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez, Gary Sheffield, Nomar Garciaparra and Carlos Delgado.

That is seven first ballot types (Piazza, Biggio, Maddux, Glavine, Thomas, Johnson and Martinez) and five or six who will be drawing more votes in the next several elections than anyone in the returning class with the possible exception of Bagwell.

In 2012, Larkin was free of any outstanding newcomers or outrageously overlooked retunees as competition. He dived through that window. No one else who was in today's election is going to get enshrined for at least four or five years, probably longer. Anyone whose eligibility expires during that time, such as Jack Morris, can kiss their writer election chances goodbye and start cozying up to the Vet Committee members.
Good post, I also liked the article on ESPN yesterday about the class of 2013:

2013 Hall of Fame ballot will be all about performance-enhancing drugs - ESPN

I'd vote for Bonds in a heartbeat, and I think he will eventually get in, but it won't be for several years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2012, 01:23 AM
 
Location: Long Island,New York
8,164 posts, read 15,160,322 times
Reputation: 2534
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdm2008 View Post
Piazza is the best hitting catcher of all time. Piazza is in without a doubt. Piazza and Edgar Martinez shouldn't even be spoken of in the same sentance.
I guess you didn't understand the comparison. Piazza was useless behind the plate and that's why I consider him a DH. Edgar was a great hitter. Obviously he didn't have the power that Piazza had.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2012, 01:25 AM
 
Location: Long Island,New York
8,164 posts, read 15,160,322 times
Reputation: 2534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeish View Post
Good post, I also liked the article on ESPN yesterday about the class of 2013:

2013 Hall of Fame ballot will be all about performance-enhancing drugs - ESPN

I'd vote for Bonds in a heartbeat, and I think he will eventually get in, but it won't be for several years.
Before his drastic increase in size he was a great ball player during the pittsburgh years. That's why i think he should get in. As a person I think he is a POS but it should be mostly based on his on-field performance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top