Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,545,788 times
Reputation: 6319

Advertisements

I've always loved this 767:


http://www.howitflies.com/files/phot...ng_767-200.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2013, 09:34 PM
 
7,280 posts, read 10,945,411 times
Reputation: 11491
B58 Hustler. Pure power, sleek as an overstuffed dart.

If anything ever could, the Hustler could probably prove the speed of light could indeed be broken. For those into such things, the Hustler was shown in the movie Fail-Safe as the infamous Vindicator nuclear bomber that devastated Moscow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 12:51 PM
 
63 posts, read 63,019 times
Reputation: 51
I've always been a fan of the MD-13... featuring the General Electric GE-150C. (200,000lbs thrust).

Capable of cruising at 55,000ft.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,545,788 times
Reputation: 6319
Quote:
Originally Posted by hforce67 View Post
I've always been a fan of the MD-13... featuring the General Electric GE-150C. (200,000lbs thrust).

Capable of cruising at 55,000ft.
That's an absolute beauty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2013, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,523,673 times
Reputation: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpolyglot View Post
I agree with your 764 comments.

Is this 739ER what COPA would fly from LAX to Panama, and Panama to Buenos Aires? If so, I didn't like it very much. I think each segment was 6 to 7 hours ... way too long to be on a B 737.

Here's a view of a jet and a carrier I am disappointed no longer comes in to Los Angeles. The Argentines were very proud to fly their jumbo (a 747-200) between LA and BA. One can tell how long ago service ceased. This is one of their initial paint schemes. The 20 story +/- LA Airport Marriott is smack in the middle of the picture in the background.

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../5/0468574.jpg

Few things were cooler when I was a kid than having a 747 pass some 200 feet above you on Sepulveda Blvd. in LA, which was right next to the north runways they often landed on.
IIRC, COPA flies the 73G on the long hauls. I flew a CO 73G on EWR-LAX in 2005. Never again. That plane is straight up uncomfortable.

I couldn't even imagine. Living near LAX for school in the mid/late 2000s the most interesting birds you'd see taking off were 777 and 744.


Back in the late 80s/early 90s you had tons of UA 747, DL 1011, TW L1011, AA DC10. It must have been heaven for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2013, 12:59 PM
 
Location: MSP
48 posts, read 145,457 times
Reputation: 50
Nothing sexier than a slim and sleak 757-200

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2013, 02:55 PM
 
Location: North West Northern Ireland.
20,633 posts, read 23,870,349 times
Reputation: 3107
Gorgeous. I'm flying on Easyjet soon on a boring A319 and i'm raging I hate airbus planes, they are so boring looking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2013, 02:58 PM
 
Location: SoCal
1,242 posts, read 1,946,421 times
Reputation: 848
The 777, A340/330, old Skunkworks planes and cool 1960's planes like the XB-70. Also, anything old and British. My favorite of alltime is the VC-10. And the V-Jet Bombers? HELL YES.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, Florida
15,395 posts, read 22,518,195 times
Reputation: 11134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selfmade92 View Post
Nothing sexier than a slim and sleak 757-200
Great Picture.

I love the new CESTOL(Cruise Efficient Short Takeoff Landing) Aircraft.

The engines are on top of the wings to decrease surface noise and increase lift by causing lower pressure on top of wings as exhaust flows over them..... making them more fuel efficient.

New one piece flaps increase takeoff/landing angles allowing for shorter runways.

Future of Flight | STOL Aircraft Become Cruise Efficient | Popular Science | Popular Science

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 06:29 AM
 
Location: SW France
16,663 posts, read 17,426,834 times
Reputation: 29957
An aircraft that's in my top three is the Supermarine Spitfire.

Here's some photos I took on Saturday of a Mk IX version;







Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top