Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2009, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,300,843 times
Reputation: 29985

Advertisements

1) It's a fat hog

2) No manual tranny option

3) I hate AWD systems that only send torque to the rear wheels if the front wheels start to slip.

All that aside, I have high hopes for Ford's Ecoboost line of engines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2009, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,300,843 times
Reputation: 29985
Quote:
Originally Posted by las vegas drunk View Post
I had a 1992 Taurus Sho. Trust me, that car had no problem outrunning ricers. They never knew what hit them.
I had an '89 that looked clapped-out and beat to hell, but it was actually mechanically flawless; the motor ran like it was brand-new. (Just sold it a few weeks ago ) Plus it had a Superchip, Borla exhaust and K&N filter. I'd estimate conservatively that it was putting at least 250HP to the flywheel. I wiped the smirk off a lot of rice kiddies' faces with that car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,515 posts, read 33,352,881 times
Reputation: 7625
One of my cars is a Ford (well, a Lincoln... 1995).
And one reason I bought it is because I know the Town Cars are fine driving cars (great on the freeway) yet are not high maintenance cars and I don't have to worry about them breaking often and I don't need to be a good mechanic.

Like many others, I would not want to own an out-of-warranty BMW. Or, for that matter, an in-warranty BMW!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,300,843 times
Reputation: 29985
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTsLiKeAnEgG View Post
The first gen SHO was a completely different beast. It was light, handled well and was the 3rd fastest sedan in the world at the time of its release.
I wouldn't say it "handled well." It handled better than anyone had any reason to expect from a Taurus. But at the end of the day there was no hiding that it was a Taurus chassis, and frankly that Yahama engine was just too much motor for that platform.

I always intuitively knew it wasn't a handling monster, but I finally had it put into perspective for me when I got absolutely murdered on a clover-leaf on-ramp by a Mk2 Volkswagen GTi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,300,843 times
Reputation: 29985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosinante View Post
It's American made and that's enough for me to put it on top of the list. I prefer to support my neighbors, not some Oriental or European family.
This argument is so tired and has been deconstructed so many times that it's hardly worth the bother to do it yet again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,300,843 times
Reputation: 29985
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfgod View Post
yachtcare wrote;

IIRC the SHO is $38K, the BMW is about $54K. Both twin turbo V6, Ford about 350HP, BMW about 305. But as someone else pointed out the Ford is heavier.

golfgod
BMW is a straight 6, not a V. It's also 500cc smaller. And if someone put the BMW turbo 6 on a dyno, I bet it would be putting out more than the advertised 300. I've suspected for a while that BMW underrates its engines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 02:22 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,767,998 times
Reputation: 14746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
1) It's a fat hog

2) No manual tranny option

3) I hate AWD systems that only send torque to the rear wheels if the front wheels start to slip.

All that aside, I have high hopes for Ford's Ecoboost line of engines.
#2 and #3 are very, very good points.

I did not realize this was the case! Those are dealkillers for me, especially those "All wheel drive" cars that are just front-wheel drive with glorified traction control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 02:45 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,130,341 times
Reputation: 4079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
BMW is a straight 6, not a V. It's also 500cc smaller. And if someone put the BMW turbo 6 on a dyno, I bet it would be putting out more than the advertised 300. I've suspected for a while that BMW underrates its engines.
I believe its well understood that a lot of the European makes tend to be conservative when advertising engine output.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,300,843 times
Reputation: 29985
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTsLiKeAnEgG View Post
I believe its well understood that a lot of the European makes tend to be conservative when advertising engine output.
Never really heard that about European makes. I do remember the laughable situation in Japan right up through the end of the 90s where engines putting out 300-plus horsepower were "officially" rated at 280PS (276 HP) because of an unwritten rule there that engines should not exceed that output. That taboo has since been broken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 03:35 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,130,341 times
Reputation: 4079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
Never really heard that about European makes. I do remember the laughable situation in Japan right up through the end of the 90s where engines putting out 300-plus horsepower were "officially" rated at 280PS (276 HP) because of an unwritten rule there that engines should not exceed that output. That taboo has since been broken.
It was called the Gentlemens Agreement. The Germans did something similar by setting their speed limiters at the same level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top