Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Aren't you the guy who likes the rear-end styling of the Corvair? If so, that tells me a lot right there!
he's got you there, steve-o. you also did say that the Datsun 280z has been a great performing good looking car since it's inception. c'mon now.
i will say this, Fleet. the 1969 Charger...i'll even say the 68-70 Charger in general, (not the Daytonas-those wings are ugly ass hell) may be one of the sexiest and most bad-ass looking machines ever devised - and yet you always seem to post pictures of them that make them look like jalopies. would it kill ya to post up a picture of one that's been hot rodded a little bit instead of bone stock pink ones with narrow tires in the rear.
he's got you there, steve-o. you also did say that the Datsun 280z has been a great performing good looking car since it's inception. c'mon now.
Im a big fan of the Datsun's styling, and its got a pretty big following so Im not alone in my tastes.
http://extrudabody.com/TechInfo/DatsunZ.jpg (broken link)
Im a big fan of the Datsun's styling, and its got a pretty big following so Im not alone in my tastes.
http://extrudabody.com/TechInfo/DatsunZ.jpg (broken link)
while the car in the link you provided is "nice" for a 280z, it is a-typical of the 280 Z's you (I/[we]) see driving on the streets.
while the car in the link you provided is "nice" for a 280z, it is a-typical of the 280 Z's you (I/[we]) see driving on the streets.
Nonetheless, the 280Z (more to the point the 240Z) was a styling triumph in the 70s and it ushered in the concept of an affordable, reliable sports car.
Nonetheless, the 280Z (more to the point the 240Z) was a styling triumph in the 70s and it ushered in the concept of an affordable, reliable sports car.
see, that is where we are gonna disagree. i would hardly call it a styling triumph any more than the Mustang II was a styling triumph.
now, with modern body kits, modern wheel and tire packages, and paint, those cars can be made to look alright - but for the most part those cars look like burnt turds IMO.
see, that is where we are gonna disagree. i would hardly call it a styling triumph any more than the Mustang II was a styling triumph.
While you may disagree, it was widely regarded as a styling breakthrough in 1970. Compared to most of what was available at the time, it certainly was.
Nice Charger! But how dare you post a photo of a muscle car in this thread!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
