Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2013, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
19,446 posts, read 27,860,991 times
Reputation: 36126

Advertisements

We were interested in buying a 2-3 year old Honda Accord, Toyota Camry or Hyundai Sonata, with less than 30K miles. Frankly, we're pretty shocked at the prices for these used vehicles from dealers and having a very hard time finding them on CL or auto trader from individual sellers. Any recommendations on that issue would be welcome.

So, with all the dealer incentives, we are now considering buying a new vehicle, probably a 2013. We would probably keep this vehicle for 5-8 years (we are replacing our 2005 Camry with 95K miles, and also have a leased Hyundai Sonata).

I'm comfortable that Honda and Toyota will hold it's value, but what about the Sonata?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2013, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Prosper
6,255 posts, read 17,108,329 times
Reputation: 9502
Our Hyundai didn't hold it's value very well. If we had bought it new, we'd have been upside down on it after 3-4 years. We bought it 1 yr old, and managed to get about 2k over the loan value when we sold. This was for a Tiburon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 02:46 PM
 
5,075 posts, read 11,082,057 times
Reputation: 4669
Historically, no. However they're a lot better than they used to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
19,446 posts, read 27,860,991 times
Reputation: 36126
For that matter, do Honda and Toyota still hold their values like they used to?????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 02:56 PM
 
1,218 posts, read 3,473,854 times
Reputation: 1869
I would say a tiburon will depreciate a lot faster than a sonata. Tiburons were a pretty bad attempt at a sporty car and the sonata was a big hit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Between West Chester and Chester, PA
2,802 posts, read 3,192,103 times
Reputation: 4900
Quote:
Originally Posted by cats234 View Post
I would say a tiburon will depreciate a lot faster than a sonata. Tiburons were a pretty bad attempt at a sporty car and the sonata was a big hit.
The Tiburon's fuel economy is terrible!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 03:01 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
1,710 posts, read 4,136,560 times
Reputation: 2718
Toyota and Honda have sold ultra reliable cars for a very long time to earn their reputation, and high used car value. Hyundai only started building reliable cars in the early 2000s, and still have not quite made it to Toyota or Honda's quality yet. The also have to get people to forget about the low quality cars they sold here from the mid 1980s to the early 2000s.

I have no doubt that Hyundai/Kia will continue to improve, and their trade in value will increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 04:38 PM
 
Location: The Old Dominion
774 posts, read 1,694,505 times
Reputation: 1186
I was trying to buy a 2011-12 Genesis sedan with 12-15,000 miles recently and simply could not find a decent deal. Dealers were asking almost the same as new and simply would not bargain. Ended up buying a BMW for less money!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Hot Springs, Arkansas
389 posts, read 1,219,610 times
Reputation: 460
I've owned four Hyundais and one Kia (sister corporations). In my somewhat biased opinion, the Hyundai is nearly at the level of Toyota and Honda and has the better warranty.

I currently have a 2013 Santa Fe and it is the best car I have ever owned. I'm thinking of buying a new Elantra as a second vehicle. There are some good deals available right now. Very tempting.

I've owned about 65 cars in my lifetime. In past years the Hyundai was not well received but it is not the car it was 15-20 years ago. The vehicles are made in Georgia and Alabama. So you are buying a made in a America vehicle.

But just to be certain check out Edmunds and compare the residual values to see for sure. Another way is to compare the lease costs. If the cars hold the residual values well, the lease payment will be lower because the maker won't take a beating when the lease expires. You can also buy the vehicle when the lease runs out. So it pays to check.

But you should probably cast a wider net. Seriously consider the GM and Ford brands. Fords have gotten rather pricey lately but I will say this I have never really had any problems with them. I dumped GM a long time ago when they wouldn't fix their bad cars. Today's GM models are much, much better and I have found their products quite enticing. I haven't looked at Chrysler vehicles recently. With the possible exception of Chrysler I don't think there are really any "bad" vehicles made today. The market won't support those brands for long.

Lastly, drive all of them that are comparably equipped and see what you like the best. Then you can crunch the numbers. Just remember that two transactions are involved in a trade-in. You buy their car and they buy yours. And the price is affected by the manufacturer incentives and the dealer's ability or willingness to wheel and deal on the MRSP and invoice plus hold-back (about 3%).

To sum up, I don't see the value deal as something I would lose sleep over. I think they are about the same nowadays. You can buy a new one for about what a used car would cost so I see it as a no-brainer to buy new.

P.S. I don't consider any European vehicle. Too expensive and too unreliable in my view. The Japanese and Korean models are essentially bullet proof and Ford and GM are nipping at their heels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2013, 07:02 PM
 
Location: The Old Dominion
774 posts, read 1,694,505 times
Reputation: 1186
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmissourimule View Post
I don't consider any European vehicle. Too expensive and too unreliable in my view. The Japanese and Korean models are essentially bullet proof and Ford and GM are nipping at their heels.
Indeed.... I love European cars but they are often costly and trouble-prone. They have other virtues

US cars have improved dramatically in recent years. The only car I've ever owned (and still do) which never needed a single repair is a Ford. Eight years and running now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top