Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Morris Upchurch Middle School in Queen City, TX
(05-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 56
Address
 500 5TH ST
Queen City, TX 75572
Telephone
(903) 796-6412
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.qcisd.net
City-data.com school rating
56
Students
303
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
24.9
Free lunch eligible students
144
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
17
School district
QUEEN CITY ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
J K HILEMAN EL (0.8 miles):

87
ATLANTA EL (1.9 miles):

72
QUEEN CITY H S (0.7 miles):

68
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

56
ATLANTA H S (1.6 miles):

54
MCLEOD H S (14.1 miles):

47
ATLANTA MIDDLE (3.2 miles):

41
BLOOMBURG EL (5.0 miles):

37
BLOOMBURG H S (5.0 miles):

20
Morris Upchurch Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Cass County:

54
Queen City:

70
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

56

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 303
Enrollment in 2015: 306
Enrollment in 2014: 309
Enrollment in 2013: 310
Enrollment in 2012: 320
Enrollment in 2011: 330
Enrollment in 2010: 321
Enrollment in 2009: 296
Enrollment in 2008: 294
Enrollment in 2007: 304
Enrollment in 2006: 312
Enrollment in 2005: 314
Enrollment in 2004: 343
Enrollment in 2003: 366
Enrollment in 2002: 371
Enrollment in 2001: 361
Enrollment in 2000: 367
Enrollment in 1999: 396

Morris Upchurch Middle School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG05G06G07G08Total
All students76757379303
Female students36343533138
Male students40413846165
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - 213
Asian students1 - - 12
Hispanic students425112
Black students10108836
White students58625463237
Two or More Races students314513

Enrollment by grade:
5th grade enrollment: 76
6th grade enrollment: 75
7th grade enrollment: 73
8th grade enrollment: 79

Morris Upchurch Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 138 (45.5%)
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

45.5%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 165 (54.5%)
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

54.5%
Texas:

50.1%

Morris Upchurch Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (1.0%)
School:

1.0%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.7%)
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

0.7%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 12 (4.0%)
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

4.0%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 36 (11.9%)
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

11.9%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 237 (78.2%)
School:

78.2%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 13 (4.3%)
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

4.3%
State:

2.1%

Morris Upchurch Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 161 (53.1%)
Here:

53.1%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 144 (47.5%)
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

47.5%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 17 (5.6%)
Here:

5.6%
State:

6.2%

Morris Upchurch Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 24.9

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

12.2
Texas:

15.6

Morris Upchurch Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,327,996
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 23.9 (Salary Expenditures: $989,485)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1.5 (Salary Expenditures: $25,691)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3.5 (Salary Expenditures: $126,699)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $186,121)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $80,419
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,366,777
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,025,256
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2.5 (Salary Expenditures: $44,403)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3.5 (Salary Expenditures: $126,699)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $186,121)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $142,626

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 24 (male: 17, female: 7)
  • Black: 4 (all male)
  • White: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic2
  • Black7
  • White34
  • Multirace2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 45 (male: 30, female: 15)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 34 (male: 23, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic2
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White31
  • Multirace2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 41 (male: 21, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 31 (male: 17, female: 14)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

135.3
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,265 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,641
  • Males4,619
  • Females4,661
  • White4,702
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,641
Texas:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 21
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.1 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.2 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.2 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 71%

29%
71%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,619, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,661, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 82%)
18%
82%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,702, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 78%)
22%
78%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,629
  • Males1,644
  • Females1,611
  • Black1,600
  • White1,621
Math Average Scale Score:

1,629
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 69
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

10%
36%
26%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 37%)
5%
40%
18%
37%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 16%)
16%
32%
36%
16%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
17%
33%
17%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 24%)
10%
40%
26%
24%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,584
  • Males1,585
  • Females1,582
  • Black1,457
  • White1,590
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,584
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 69
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

19%
29%
26%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 26%)
16%
31%
27%
26%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 26%)
23%
25%
26%
26%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,457, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
50%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 26%)
17%
30%
27%
26%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,846
  • Males3,953
  • Females3,722
  • Black3,648
  • White3,863
Science Average Scale Score:

3,846
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 67
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.8 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

19%
44%
24%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,953, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 17%)
11%
42%
30%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,722, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 10%)
29%
45%
16%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,648, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
50%
33%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,863, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 13%)
16%
45%
26%
13%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,567
  • Males1,568
  • Females1,571
  • Black1,519
  • White1,585
Math Average Scale Score:

1,567
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 67
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 91

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.5 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (36%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 47%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 1%

37%
47%
15%
1%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 3%)
41%
44%
12%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,571, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 51%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 0%)
30%
51%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
67%
25%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 2%)
27%
53%
18%
2%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,550
  • Males1,550
  • Females1,553
  • Black1,471
  • White1,565
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,550
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 91
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 91

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

43%
24%
20%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 15%)
42%
27%
16%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 11%)
42%
21%
26%
11%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,471, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 79%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 7%)
79%
14%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,565, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 14%)
37%
28%
21%
14%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,642
  • Males1,643
  • Females1,640
  • Black1,605
  • White1,654
Math Average Scale Score:

1,642
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 84
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.8 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (46%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

32%
32%
25%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 11%)
31%
31%
27%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 10%)
33%
34%
23%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
47%
33%
13%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 13%)
29%
30%
28%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,650
  • Males1,620
  • Females1,679
  • Black1,623
  • White1,658
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,650
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 81
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

28%
29%
15%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 23%)
33%
38%
7%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,679, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 34%)
24%
20%
22%
34%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 29%)
50%
21%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 28%)
23%
29%
20%
28%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,898
  • Males3,752
  • Females4,042
  • Black3,638
  • White3,953
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,898
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 81
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 81

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.6 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

23%
35%
26%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,752, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 8%)
28%
43%
22%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,042, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 24%)
20%
26%
30%
24%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,638, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 15%)
54%
8%
23%
15%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,953, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 16%)
18%
40%
26%
16%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,669
  • Males1,648
  • Females1,691
  • Black1,643
  • White1,668
Math Average Scale Score:

1,669
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 91
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 111

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.5 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

25%
32%
36%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 4%)
28%
42%
26%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,691, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 9%)
22%
22%
47%
9%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 0%)
38%
32%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,668, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 6%)
23%
33%
38%
6%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,675
  • Males1,661
  • Females1,691
  • Black1,594
  • White1,692
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,675
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 89
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 111

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.4 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

28%
20%
25%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,661, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 21%)
32%
19%
28%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,691, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 33%)
24%
21%
22%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 18%)
47%
35%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,692, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 28%)
24%
17%
31%
28%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,760
  • Males3,715
  • Females3,811
  • Black3,437
  • White3,840
Science Average Scale Score:

3,760
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 86
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 88

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

38%
24%
25%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,715, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
46%
21%
22%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,811, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 15%)
30%
25%
30%
15%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,437, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
67%
20%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,840, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 15%)
32%
24%
29%
15%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,456
  • Males3,453
  • Females3,459
  • Black3,226
  • White3,522
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,456
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 87
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 88

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.9 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.7 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.4 (49%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

60%
27%
10%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,453, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 4%)
57%
30%
9%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,459, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 2%)
63%
25%
10%
2%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,226, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 87%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
87%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,522, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 4%)
52%
32%
12%
4%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 9
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 11 (male: 9, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 6
Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White22
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA2
  • 5047
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 28 (male: 20, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Morris Upchurch Middle School:

92.4
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • American Indian2
  • Black10
  • White28
  • Multirace2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 42 (male: 32, female: 10)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • White: 28 (male: 20, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • American Indian2
  • Black4
  • White4
  • Multirace2
  • 5048
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 12 (male: 6, female: 6)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 8 (all male)

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 20 (male: 7, female: 13)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 17 (male: 4, female: 13)
  • White: 17 (male: 4, female: 13)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Here:

85.0%
Texas:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Queen City, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Queen City main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Morris Upchurch Middle School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents