Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2020, 01:49 AM
 
2 posts, read 2,270 times
Reputation: 20

Advertisements

I have no idea why polluting vehicles would be allowed on a beach and the State and local parks department would rally behind this. They promote it like it’s a good thing. Then we wonder why nobody wants to invest in property or invest in making the communities more attractive. Nobody wants to visit a beautiful beach that looks like the I5 on any given day of the week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2020, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,458 posts, read 12,086,413 times
Reputation: 38975
Allowing vehicles on the beach allows for people to usefully access the beach. When the tide is out, there is a wide stretch of hard sand that is quite easy to drive on (JUST STAY ON THE HARD PACK!) and there are miles of beach for people to spread out on instead of concentrating everyone at a few, relatively undeveloped parking areas.

If people had to walk in, far fewer would be able to use it. It is not easy to walk out, carrying all the things people would need to have a fun family day at the beach. From an equality of access point of view, it makes the beach accessible to all, instead of only the young and fit. There is in fact, a stretch of beach it is legal to land and takeoff airplanes from. That's a pretty neat and unusual feature for an area.

There isn't really any harm from it, as the tide cleans up all tracks every night. Every morning, the beach is new and clean. There is probably *less* garbage left behind if people have their car right there, than if they had to pack it all out by hand. Many in fact cruise the beach picking up garbage as a hobby. Some is just garbage, some is treasures, brought in by the tide from far away places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2020, 11:53 AM
 
1,066 posts, read 891,385 times
Reputation: 1221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana Holbrook View Post
Allowing vehicles on the beach allows for people to usefully access the beach. When the tide is out, there is a wide stretch of hard sand that is quite easy to drive on (JUST STAY ON THE HARD PACK!) and there are miles of beach for people to spread out on instead of concentrating everyone at a few, relatively undeveloped parking areas.

If people had to walk in, far fewer would be able to use it. It is not easy to walk out, carrying all the things people would need to have a fun family day at the beach. From an equality of access point of view, it makes the beach accessible to all, instead of only the young and fit. There is in fact, a stretch of beach it is legal to land and takeoff airplanes from. That's a pretty neat and unusual feature for an area.

There isn't really any harm from it, as the tide cleans up all tracks every night. Every morning, the beach is new and clean. There is probably *less* garbage left behind if people have their car right there, than if they had to pack it all out by hand. Many in fact cruise the beach picking up garbage as a hobby. Some is just garbage, some is treasures, brought in by the tide from far away places.
Oregon beaches are surely empty because of this carrying stuff hardship you mention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2020, 02:46 PM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,458 posts, read 12,086,413 times
Reputation: 38975
Oregon is a different place. There are developed beach communities with boardwalks, resorts and services near the beach. Washington's oceanfront is more undeveloped and self-serve. Cruise up both with Google Earth, for a snapshot of each, and their usage. I think each way has it's plusses and minuses and fans and detractors. Variety... It's a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2020, 02:56 PM
 
1,066 posts, read 891,385 times
Reputation: 1221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana Holbrook View Post
Oregon is a different place. There are developed beach communities with boardwalks, resorts and services near the beach. Washington's oceanfront is more undeveloped and self-serve. Cruise up both with Google Earth, for a snapshot of each, and their usage. I think each way has it's plusses and minuses and fans and detractors. Variety... It's a good thing.
No need to use google earth as I’ve visited both dozens of times. I find it preferable to have no vehicles by town, and allow vehicles away from town in certain areas.
Wouldn’t variety require nice towns with no cars as well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2020, 03:03 PM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,458 posts, read 12,086,413 times
Reputation: 38975
Quote:
Originally Posted by simply1 View Post
No need to use google earth as I’ve visited both dozens of times. I find it preferable to have no vehicles by town, and allow vehicles away from town in certain areas.
Wouldn’t variety require nice towns with no cars as well?

Sure.... make it happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2020, 03:16 PM
 
1,066 posts, read 891,385 times
Reputation: 1221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana Holbrook View Post
Sure.... make it happen.
So you’re done talking about the merits, take care and don’t bother replying next time. The passive aggressive look isn’t a good one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2020, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,458 posts, read 12,086,413 times
Reputation: 38975
No, I told you why I like the way it is. I like that we can drive out on to the beach.

I understand you disagree. You think there should be more places off limits to cars.

Fine! If you feel strongly about this, you should do something to make that happen.

Washington has a lot of miles of beach... maybe we could even have both. (I think we do in fact, have both)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2020, 08:32 PM
 
Location: WA
5,439 posts, read 7,728,481 times
Reputation: 8549
We lived in Texas for about a decade and I used to despise vehicles on the beach. Port Aransas allowed it, South Padre did not. Difference was night and day for visiting. On weekends, Port Aransas could be such a drunken mess (because people with big trucks could haul enormous parties down with them) and it was unsafe to even let your kids wander for fear of getting run over by a drunk college student. South Padre was far more family-friendly. But I guess WA beaches are not that crowded.

Port Aransas



South Padre

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2020, 08:50 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,192 posts, read 107,809,412 times
Reputation: 116087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana Holbrook View Post
No, I told you why I like the way it is. I like that we can drive out on to the beach.

I understand you disagree. You think there should be more places off limits to cars.

Fine! If you feel strongly about this, you should do something to make that happen.

Washington has a lot of miles of beach... maybe we could even have both. (I think we do in fact, have both)
Is WA for some reason unfamiliar with the concept of a parking lot running parallel to the beach, but set back at a distance? There are several such spots along Lake Washington in Seattle. That's how many California beaches are set up. No one has to drive onto the beach. Most, if not all, the beaches in CA are state parks, anyway, so it's not allowed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top