Scientific proof of god's existence

[carneadesthatesstratoofga]

Campbell34, ah. the ad baculum argument- threat of force- Hell. Your reveling in our going to Hell as that jerk cult leader Yeshua did wins no arguments but makes you blaspheme logic. Just admit to yourself that you have no case and it's your whining that people need a relationship with that tyrant God that evidently drives you to use sophistry.
clepsydra, do you really expect that rational beings will accept your fantasy? You give no evidence for your prattle. My thread why believe reveals why God cannot exist. Try there to overcome the presumption of naturalism and the atelic argument instead of distorting science!
Your prattle is like it is orthogonal to the perpendicular why things need God.
How could God that married bachelor do anything anyway?

[PanTerra]

Originally Posted by carneadesthatesstratoofga

Campbell34, ah. the ad baculum argument- threat of force- Hell. Your reveling in our going to Hell as that jerk cult leader Yeshua did wins no arguments but makes you blaspheme logic. Just admit to yourself that you have no case and it's your whining that people need a relationship with that tyrant God that evidently drives you to use sophistry.
clepsydra, do you really expect that rational beings will accept your fantasy? You give no evidence for your prattle. My thread why believe reveals why God cannot exist. Try there to overcome the presumption of naturalism and the atelic argument instead of distorting science!
Your prattle is like it is orthogonal to the perpendicular why things need God.
How could God that married bachelor do anything anyway?

Really? Reviving old threads can reveal a sort of attrition of the posters. Campbell34, RIP.

[JeeperZ]

Originally Posted by Jaymax

Are you kidding? Where to start?

It's not "scientific proof" as he claims. It's a clumsy hypotheses in which he makes statements of fact that are really assumptions, makes leaps of "faith", draws illogical conclusions and adds a lot of unneccessary fluffy filler. If he tried to defend this "hypotheses" in front of a PhD panel and made claims that it was proof that "GOD DID IT" (and a personal god at that), he would fail and be told to take a first year philosophy course to learn how to make logical arguments or go to a religious college where he doesn't have to be logical.

Tell me what is right with it apart from the fact that properties of the universe can be described mathematically.

I have here: In Six Days
It is a remarkable book - written by 50 Scientists with PhD's - in All fields of Science. Botany - Physical Chemistry - BioChemistry-Zoology-Astronomy- Meterology-Medical Research etc. etc. Virtually all fields of science.

Each Scientist uses his/her expertise in their fields to prove that Evolution is 100% IMPOSSIBLE theory to test! Each scientist is in complete agreement with the book of Genesis - The Earth and all that is - Was created in 6-24 hour days and they each provide the necessary proof - using "science". (testable)!!

Einstein became very famous for E= mc 2 You never hear of the real discovery that was made - E=hc

Genesis 1:1In the beginning God made the heavens & the earth = "Pi" to four exact decimal points (??)
John 1:1 In Beginning was the Word and the Word was with(in) The God & God was the Word = e to four exact decimal points. (??)

Pi & e are the two most popular constants in advanced mathematics.

The odds of those two verses = those two constants to 4 exact decimal points is Ten to the 55th Power.

That is the number 10 with fifty five zero's!! That is absurd! That is no coincidence!

God is very clever in the Bible - ponder these two verses;

Proverbs chapter 25 - It is the Glory of God to conceal a matter!
Proverbs chapter 2 = Search the scriptures as for 'hidden treasure'.

In the book of Genesis chapter 5. We have a list of ten names (Adam - Noah) - there is a special message (hidden) in that chapter that reveals God's plan for redemption for mankind was in place BEFORE THE FLOOD.

Make a list of the ten names - place the (biblical) meaning for each of those names beside the name.

That list of MEANINGS will shock you!!

Adam = MAN (can you find the rest)??

God's handprint is all through the entire bible - Jesus Christ is on every page of Genesis

Here is a biblical riddle - Methuselah was the oldest man in the bible. He lived to be 969 years old.

How is it possible Methuselah died BEFORE his Father??

Adam = Man [is]

Seth = Appointed

Enosh = Mortal

Kenan = Sorrow

Mahalalel = The blessed God

Jared = Shall come down

Enoch = Teaching

Methuselah = His death shall bring

Lamech = The despairing

Noah = Rest or comfort

The bible is a book which was written Outside of our time domain


The more you know about "testable" science the easier it is to understand Genesis!!

Originally Posted by JeeperZ

In the book of Genesis chapter 5. We have a list of ten names (Adam - Noah) - there is a special message (hidden) in that chapter that reveals God's plan for redemption for mankind was in place BEFORE THE FLOOD.

Make a list of the ten names - place the (biblical) meaning for each of those names beside the name.

That list of MEANINGS will shock you!!

Adam = MAN (can you find the rest)??

God's handprint is all through the entire bible - Jesus Christ is on every page of Genesis

Here is a biblical riddle - Methuselah was the oldest man in the bible. He lived to be 969 years old.

How is it possible Methuselah died BEFORE his Father??

Adam = Man [is]

Seth = Appointed

Enosh = Mortal

Kenan = Sorrow

Mahalalel = The blessed God

Jared = Shall come down

Enoch = Teaching

Methuselah = His death shall bring

Lamech = The despairing

Noah = Rest or comfort

The bible is a book which was written Outside of our time domain

The above is bogus - read and weep!

The Naked Bible » Allegorical Interpretation of the Names in Genesis 5

The more you know about "testable" science the easier it is to understand Genesis!!

You don't understand jack about science. The theory of evolution has actually made predictions and can be falsified - What are the predictions of Genesis and how is it tested - please explain.

By the way stop parroting Chuck Missler - you are offering nothing new nor impressing me with you 'insight' and glorious truths of the Bible.

[JeeperZ]

Those names in Genesis were not derived from an Allegorical Interpretation of the names; but a study of the original root meanings of the Hebrew is the only way to discern the proper meaning of that name - NOT ALLEGORICAL - that is a huge mistake.

Thanks for taking the time to show everyone!!

By the way I wasn't aware it is against the Terms of Service to quote (any) author!!

I will have to stop doing that and do as you suggest eh ?

Originally Posted by JeeperZ

Those names in Genesis were not derived from an Allegorical Interpretation of the names; but a study of the original root meanings of the Hebrew is the only way to discern the proper meaning of that name - NOT ALLEGORICAL - that is a huge mistake.

The mistake is all yours. Those are proper names in genre of Genealogy. Root meanings have nothing to do with it - you would have learned that if you actually read the link. Look-up 'root fallacy' and perhaps even learn some basic linguistic and exegetical principles - if you are going to make comments about a link then at least read or at least try to understand and comprehend it.

Thanks for taking the time to show everyone!!

Your Welcome!

By the way I wasn't aware it is against the Terms of Service to quote (any) author!!

It's not, but if you are you should give attribution to the author rather than just quoting them without a link or reference - don't yah think? Oh! I don't recall any quotation marks or you saying that it was a quote regardless of your failure to give attribution.

I will have to stop doing that and do as you suggest eh ?

That would be the right thing to do! I am very familiar with Christian doctrine and contemporary apologetics. Based on what you wrote it is clear that you are mining stuff from Missler - don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.

Next!