Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I actually think it will be a mistrial.
They asked the jury where they got their news.
The one Juror only gets his/her news from Truth Social and X (twitter)....that tells me that they are a huge Trump fan
and lets just say that I doubt that they are going to be able to stay unbiased.
It only takes one juror.
Of course, with a mistrial they can try the case again.
It is going to be hard (maybe almost impossible) to find jurors on this who are neutral or unbiased.
First witness down and he testified to nothing particularly illegal.
My prediction, once the actual crime is established to have occured well after the election, the “election interference” falls apart, the felony enhancement is dropped, and Trump pays a 25k fine for 34 misdemeanors.
But the overall Dem goal of general election interference is accomplished.
First witness down and he testified to nothing particularly illegal.
My prediction, once the actual crime is established to have occured well after the election, the “election interference” falls apart, the felony enhancement is dropped, and Trump pays a 25k fine for 34 misdemeanors.
But the overall Dem goal of general election interference is accomplished.
If the alleged crime occurred AFTER the election, how can it have been election interference?
So Trump committed a crime by conspiring to unlawfully promote his own candidacy, by paying to quash a potentially embarrassing story and then reimbursing his lawyer Michael Cohen with other legal expenses.
Paying SD hush money is not illegal.
Bragg is trying to elevate a misdemeanor crime, falsification of business records, to felony level, claiming it was done to facilitate another crime which is the only possible way he can elevate his 34 counts against Trump to felony level.
Intent to commit another crime can never be proven.
It’s a twisted concept and prosecutors know it’s a sham.
All being done as election interference, in collusion with the Biden regime.
Prosecutors have been to the WH colluding.
I didn't know 'conspiracy to stop stories' was a crime.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike0618
If it is then all the media is guilty with squashing the hunter biden laptop story before 2020 election.
It's not a crime. Remember the 2008 election and the JournoList scandal, in which the MSM collaborated to quash stories damaging to Obama (most notably his very close relationship to 'God Damn America' Rev Wright and extreme bigot Louis Farrakhan, including photos, etc.)?
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,972 posts, read 12,780,673 times
Reputation: 10622
Quote:
Originally Posted by exm
So Trump committed a crime by conspiring to unlawfully promote his own candidacy, by paying to quash a potentially embarrassing story and then reimbursing his lawyer Michael Cohen with other legal expenses.
Got that? Because I don’t.
And the prosecutions witness had stated that 'Trump does not pay off people because word of it always gets out'.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
