Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2020, 01:47 PM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,474 posts, read 11,591,020 times
Reputation: 11992

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
What would be your explanation on why a Conservative Judge flips to Liberal like Roberts has? How about a bit of intellectual effort on your part?
Clearly it’s because he had sex with demons.

PS. There is nothing remotely intellectual about making wild speculations.

Last edited by SkyDog77; 08-06-2020 at 02:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2020, 01:59 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,343 posts, read 16,420,843 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
ask your friend if she thinks Ruth Bader Ginsburg is an independent jurist.
If you read and digested what my friend said - you would see that her issue is not with the Justice, in either direction, it's not even that the VP is criticizing a Justice - it's the argument being made against the Justice's decisions.

Pence's criticism isn't with matters of law, or even "legislating from the bench" - it's that his decisions haven't been "conservative enough". A judge's responsibility is not to be "liberal" or "conservative" - that's a question of politics not of law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2020, 02:08 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,117,389 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDog77 View Post
Clearly it’s because he had sex with demons.
I can believe this before I believe anything from this Qanon hoaxter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2020, 02:36 PM
 
6,620 posts, read 5,024,213 times
Reputation: 3691
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Where does credibility play into an opinion?
Now it all makes sense, who else thinks this way?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2020, 05:08 PM
 
20,800 posts, read 8,625,192 times
Reputation: 14432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
When your prediction doesn’t happen in 2 weeks, will you finally admit that Q Anon is not real?
No. Q didn't predict a date, the whistleblower did. I found it interesting because he echoed the same belief as Q and because it's only two or three weeks away so not long to wait to see if this whistleblower is reliable. If it's false, everyone knows not to trust that source. Nothing more or less.

Unlike mainstream media which gets everything wrong and keeps trusting their unreliable sources. I don't hear Dems claiming they aren't real.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2020, 09:06 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,117,389 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
No. Q didn't predict a date, the whistleblower did. I found it interesting because he echoed the same belief as Q and because it's only two or three weeks away so not long to wait to see if this whistleblower is reliable. If it's false, everyone knows not to trust that source. Nothing more or less.

Unlike mainstream media which gets everything wrong and keeps trusting their unreliable sources. I don't hear Dems claiming they aren't real.
What has this Qanon gotten right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2020, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
2,450 posts, read 976,242 times
Reputation: 3008
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
I dont buy that for a second!


If a 'Supreme court justice' turned up in one of these investigations, the FBI, wouldnt be 'sitting him down', the justice HIMSELF, would be telling the FBI how things are going to go and that they will erase his name and any connection to this case!


By itself, the FBI, doesnt have enough power to target a Supreme Court justice, I doubt they would even attempt it either.
The FBI targeted the incoming President of the United States on the order of the sitting President of the United States. Targeting a SOCTUS wouldn't be much different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2020, 06:11 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,343 posts, read 16,420,843 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUNNDFRNT View Post
Now it all makes sense, who else thinks this way?
Expound, please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2020, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,333 posts, read 23,812,713 times
Reputation: 38800
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
No. Q didn't predict a date, the whistleblower did. I found it interesting because he echoed the same belief as Q and because it's only two or three weeks away so not long to wait to see if this whistleblower is reliable. If it's false, everyone knows not to trust that source. Nothing more or less.

Unlike mainstream media which gets everything wrong and keeps trusting their unreliable sources. I don't hear Dems claiming they aren't real.
I’m not a Dem. What I am is someone who already gave you everything when the “original” Q came out and revealed it was all made up. The idiots who continue to make videos are nothing but opportunits making money off of the gullible. Of course they want “Q Anon” to keep being real, it’s the easiest gig in town. Go to now ruined by bored housewives 4chan, make up a bunch of crap, create a video about it, making wild speculations, get the gullible to watch, and cha-ching. Is Praying Medic still doing that?

You all have been had.

What “whistle blower”? You can make that up, easily because no one has a name. It’s just a “whistle blower”.

You don’t believe when media claims there’s a whistle blower ( nor do I), but you’ll believe there’s a whistle blower because some random person on the internet said there was one? When real whistle blowers come forward, we typically know who they are in a short amount of time. I’m still waiting for those “indictments Q predicted 3 years ago. Crickets.

It’s fake. Stop falling for your this,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2020, 06:38 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,343 posts, read 16,420,843 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
I’m not a Dem. What I am is someone who already gave you everything when the “original” Q came out and revealed it was all made up. The idiots who continue to make videos are nothing but opportunits making money off of the gullible. Of course they want “Q Anon” to keep being real, it’s the easiest gig in town. Go to now ruined by bored housewives 4chan, make up a bunch of crap, create a video about it, making wild speculations, get the gullible to watch, and cha-ching. Is Praying Medic still doing that?

You all have been had.

What “whistle blower”? You can make that up, easily because no one has a name. It’s just a “whistle blower”.

You don’t believe when media claims there’s a whistle blower ( nor do I), but you’ll believe there’s a whistle blower because some random person on the internet said there was one? When real whistle blowers come forward, we typically know who they are in a short amount of time. I’m still waiting for those “indictments Q predicted 3 years ago. Crickets.

It’s fake. Stop falling for your this,

Couldn't rep you again, yet!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top