Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If any government official was on the take regarding Epstein its Trump appointee Alexander Acosta. Yet I don't here Trumpers bring this up or why Trump chose him of all people. You wonder what Acosta might know about Trump and Epstein
Republicans: Interesting. I would like to know more about this possible conflict.
Democrats: Not true. Source not credible. You Republicans are crazy.
OMFG. What is it going to take for you people not to defend every leftie out of the gate without the facts?
Who is the leftie here Chief Roberts? and what facts are you speaking of?
Those tapes may not even exist, you have an interview with a person close to Maxwell who claims that she has tapes as insurance and its going to trade them to the feds. No factual information. 1 out of 700 people in the population of the USA have the last name Roberts.
If a 'Supreme court justice' turned up in one of these investigations, the FBI, wouldnt be 'sitting him down', the justice HIMSELF, would be telling the FBI how things are going to go and that they will erase his name and any connection to this case!
By itself, the FBI, doesnt have enough power to target a Supreme Court justice, I doubt they would even attempt it either.
If the FBI has evidence that Roberts broke the law, & had sex with underage girls, the FBI has all the power they need to act.
I predicted to my wife during the Obamacare legality hearings, after Roberts helped Obama get his ACA enacted, that somebody had something big on Roberts, and then the odd rulings just kept coming and coming.
If the FBI has evidence that Roberts broke the law, & had sex with underage girls, the FBI has all the power they need to act.
I predicted to my wife during the Obamacare legality hearings, after Roberts helped Obama get his ACA enacted, that somebody had something big on Roberts, and then the odd rulings just kept coming and coming.
And Q followers are trying to tell us that 2+2=13 and you take this crap seriously?
How do you explain a Conservative Supreme Court Judge re-writing the ACA so it could pass muster, and then handing out Liberal rulings out one after another? Why the 180 change in political philosophy?
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
The Deepstate has had many ways to direct government in the direction they want.
Nah, it's all because of that damn pizzeria basement in Virginia.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
