[Not_liking_FL]

Originally Posted by PriusH8r

Without a doubt YES.

And even more so, they are thinking about what will happen to them DIRECTLY by some loons should they let him walk.

There is no doubt in my mind they could find him guilty, because they are afraid. Will be truthfully he guilty? I have no idea.

I trust that the jury will give him a fair trial. It was not that long ago that a jury found Casey Anthony not guilty while most people thought she was guilty as sin. There was no racial element involved, but that jury probably had good reason to fear for their safety after the verdict.

[DUNNDFRNT]

Originally Posted by PriusH8r

You were not there. You do not know that. You want to believe that. Let's let the facts come out.

The same way you want to believe that even if the jury finds GZ guilty it will only be because they are afraid of the repercussions. Clearly you made up your mind.

[The Villages Guy]

Originally Posted by DUNNDFRNT

The same way you want to believe that even if the jury finds GZ guilty it will only be because they are afraid of the repercussions. Clearly you made up your mind.

Ya know, it really really gets old when you people change what I said or put words in my mouth. Here is the part where I spoke about that:

Originally Posted by PriusH8r

There is no doubt in my mind they could find him guilty, because they are afraid. Will be truthfully he guilty? I have no idea.

I said they "COULD" find him guilty. I did NOT day they "WILL" find him guilty.

I also said I have no idea if he will be truthfully guilty. He could be guilty as sin or it could be exactly as he stated.

Some of you need to stop claiming I said something I didn't, as it is really easy to copy my previous post to prove you wrong.

[Not_liking_FL]

Originally Posted by PriusH8r

Ya know, it really really gets old when you people change what I said or put words in my mouth. Here is the part where I spoke about that:

I get the impression that you and another poster think he's innocent. That is ok though because unless I hear something new I think he is guilty.

[The Villages Guy]

Originally Posted by Not_liking_FL

I trust that the jury will give him a fair trial. It was not that long ago that a jury found Casey Anthony not guilty while most people thought she was guilty as sin. There was no racial element involved, but that jury probably had good reason to fear for their safety after the verdict.

Casey Anthony had no high tension racial component. This one does. It has been widely broadcast that it does. Certain groups have already made it clear, in as many words, that if the jury does not find him guilty, then they will handle it. You can easily find that info....if you even want to. Burying your head in the sand about reality does not change it.

Come to think of it, I wonder if that is why the media is so blatantly misrepresenting the physical age and condition of Trayvon prior to the killing. Are they afraid themselves of some backlash, should they use the more accurate pictures? Hmmmmmm........

[The Villages Guy]

Originally Posted by Not_liking_FL

I get the impression that you and another poster think he's innocent. That is ok though because unless I hear something new I think he is guilty.

I have no idea if he is guilty or innocent. I just want the "correct" judgement, whatever way it goes.

It is a shame that you have prejudged him....backing up what I said earlier. You and I do not have all the evidence. Z-man "claims" Trayvon was on top of him, pounding his head into the ground. There is documented proof, which has been widely shown, showing Z-man had injuries consistent with his story. "IF" that is the case, Z-man is in a good position to win....as that is fairly easy to argue self defense. But again, I have not nor have you seen ALL the evidence........so "I" will wait to make up my mind. That is the "proper" thing to do.

[Jammie]

I live miles away from Florida and have seen numerous pictures of Trayvon Martin in the news media and it's clear to me that he was physically an adult. There is no question about that in my mind since I've seen pics of him with his family that were taken shortly before he was shot to death. The store's surveillance picture of him with his hoodie on has been shown frequently.

Keep in mind that Trayvon Martin was the victim and he's dead. If his offenses are true, there is no way that Zimmerman would've even been aware of anything in his past since he's probably not capable of reading minds. Using that as an excuse for him feeling he needed to follow and shoot him just doesn't wash.

Will George Zimmerman's record be brought up in court?

George Zimmerman, Son of a Retired Judge, Has 3 Closed Arrests

I don't know if that site is legit, but there are plenty other sites that will give you the same story.

Will the illegal and questionable things that George Zimmerman and his wife have done since the incident be brought into the trial? It could give jurors a hint into the character of the man who is on trial rather then focusing on if the victim smoked pot.

[DUNNDFRNT]

Originally Posted by PriusH8r

Ya know, it really really gets old when you people change what I said or put words in my mouth. Here is the part where I spoke about that:




I said they "COULD" find him guilty. I did NOT day they "WILL" find him guilty.

I also said I have no idea if he will be truthfully guilty. He could be guilty as sin or it could be exactly as he stated.

Some of you need to stop claiming I said something I didn't, as it is really easy to copy my previous post to prove you wrong.

Exactly, you should read what you said and in the context in which you said it.

[The Villages Guy]

Originally Posted by DUNNDFRNT

Exactly, you should read what you said and in the context in which you said it.

I did and I explained it to you perfectly. You simply saw it they way you wanted it to be, instead of how it is.


You and a couple others are simply upset because "I" won't convict the guy BEFORE the jury MAY.

[The Villages Guy]

Originally Posted by Jammie

Will the illegal and questionable things that George Zimmerman and his wife have done since the incident be brought into the trial? It could give jurors a hint into the character of the man who is on trial rather then focusing on if the victim smoked pot.

The character of BOTH parties should be heavily discussed in court. It should not be one sided. Z-man's side of the story MAY be 100% correct and he MAY have acted in self defense. On the other hand Z-man could be a loose cannon and could have gone after and intentionally murdered someone. Or it could be something in between. WE do not know for sure. I sure hope that if anyone here ever gets arrested for something and they did not do it, they get FAIR and IMPARTIAL jurors and not people who are out to convict and execute......THEN as questions later.