Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-10-2024, 01:46 PM
 
10,816 posts, read 5,746,640 times
Reputation: 10989

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Eagle View Post
You do know our social safety system is not given away nor lasts forever. You have to qualify for it and many times it does a poor job of helping people. There are people on a wait list for government housing for example. While no one is dying on the street there are plenty more living on the streets. Not to mention people who have a place to live but are barely getting by. I have both volunteered and gave money to help the poor what have you done? You want to pretend being poor is ok that way you do not have to do anything to help.
It is given away and some aspects of it can go on forever.

In any event, notwithstanding your protestations to the contrary, the social safety net IS robust, and people aren’t dying in the streets due to starvation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2024, 10:14 AM
 
8,079 posts, read 3,987,124 times
Reputation: 15110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Eagle View Post
There are people on a wait list for government housing for example. .
Most of those people already have a roof over their head and hence do not need government housing. Instead, they can get a job, earn money, & pay for their own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2024, 10:52 AM
 
19,954 posts, read 18,253,536 times
Reputation: 17391
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
It is given away and some aspects of it can go on forever.

In any event, notwithstanding your protestations to the contrary, the social safety net IS robust, and people aren’t dying in the streets due to starvation.
Most years the only country that spends more in total vs. GDP on social welfare than the US is France. That comes from The OECD not me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2024, 06:06 PM
 
3,301 posts, read 2,381,977 times
Reputation: 6794
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShampooBanana View Post
Given that it only affects about 6% of all workers, it won't affect it much at all. Especially given that the average increase is less than $0.80 per hour. Besides, you don't think that workers wages, even the lowest paid, should also keep pace with inflation?
No, because a minimum wage job is not meant to be a living wage. It is meant to not totally rip off workers and give them nothing. It is designed for high school kids or people without any skills. Thoat category of people deserve minimal o wages. If one wants to make more money, they need to make themselves market able by getting educated or experienced doing something. Some kid pushing shopping cats in the parking lot should be getting $5/ hour and not $15/ hr. That will give them the incentive Tim better themselves.

Thanks to this idiotic trend, a $1 hamburger at McDonalds two years ago is now $2.75. They have to raise the prices to pay the people with no skills. Great huh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2024, 06:07 PM
 
3,301 posts, read 2,381,977 times
Reputation: 6794
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDS_ View Post
Most years the only country that spends more in total vs. GDP on social welfare than the US is France. That comes from The OECD not me.
That is pretty sad considering France is a socialist country. We shouldn’t be paying 10@ of what we are wasting our money on welfare now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2024, 08:09 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,023 posts, read 2,283,224 times
Reputation: 2173
Quote:
Originally Posted by moguldreamer View Post
Most of those people already have a roof over their head and hence do not need government housing. Instead, they can get a job, earn money, & pay for their own.
How do you know they don’t have a job seems like an assumption on your part. Maybe they work and can’t afford their current housing. Show some evidence this is true or it is just a baseless assumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2024, 07:13 AM
 
8,079 posts, read 3,987,124 times
Reputation: 15110
Quote:
Originally Posted by trusso11783 View Post
No, because a minimum wage job is not meant to be a living wage. It is meant to not totally rip off workers and give them nothing. It is designed for high school kids or people without any skills. Thoat category of people deserve minimal o wages.
The problem with that line of thinking is the opposition might reply, "OK, let's have one minimum wage for high school kids and learners, and a second minimum wage for high school graduates, and the third minimum wage for college students, and a fourth for college graduates, where each step along the way is much higher than the last."

That's not the direction we want to go.


Quote:
Originally Posted by trusso11783 View Post
Thanks to this idiotic trend, a $1 hamburger at McDonalds two years ago is now $2.75. They have to raise the prices to pay the people with no skills. Great huh?
The drivers of the price increase are not merely labor but also a dramatic increase in the price of the raw ingredients in fast food and overhead items of insurance and paying for expensive green energy from utilities -- all of which can be traced to the Federal Government's $5 Billion Helicopter Drop enabled by the Federal Reserve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2024, 07:17 AM
 
8,079 posts, read 3,987,124 times
Reputation: 15110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Eagle View Post
How do you know they don’t have a job seems like an assumption on your part.
You're right. Perhaps I should have said "get a job or get a 2nd or 3rd job, earn more money by adding more value to society through work, etc."

Quote:
Originally Posted by trusso11783 View Post
Maybe they work and can’t afford their current housing.
If they can't afford their current housing, they would be homeless. Most are not.

Or, maybe they do indeed afford their current housing but are lazy and want to be on the public dole so they can work even less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2024, 07:52 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,023 posts, read 2,283,224 times
Reputation: 2173
Quote:
Originally Posted by moguldreamer View Post
You're right. Perhaps I should have said "get a job or get a 2nd or 3rd job, earn more money by adding more value to society through work, etc."



If they can't afford their current housing, they would be homeless. Most are not.

Or, maybe they do indeed afford their current housing but are lazy and want to be on the public dole so they can work even less.
Why should people have to kill themselves working two to three jobs just to survive? Do you think this is good for people to always be exhausted and not have time for family or friends? Why don’t you just come out and say you think they should be slaves because that is pretty much what you are saying. It is cruel and unethical to expect people to reach a certain standard of job just to survive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2024, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,880 posts, read 26,443,228 times
Reputation: 34087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Eagle View Post
Why should people have to kill themselves working two to three jobs just to survive? Do you think this is good for people to always be exhausted and not have time for family or friends? Why don’t you just come out and say you think they should be slaves because that is pretty much what you are saying. It is cruel and unethical to expect people to reach a certain standard of job just to survive.
you are absolutely right but large employers think it's great, and strive to get rid of minimum wage and unions - if they can get workers who have no choice but to work long hours with wages that just barely lets them pay their rent and buy food they are happy, and they are always very careful to cut off hours before those employees are eligible for health benefits or a 401k . Project 2025 very craftially offers 'ways' to right the ship and make sure employers aren't harmed by having to pay the peons too much. https://www.project2025.org/policy/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top