Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2009, 11:51 PM
 
Location: US Empire, Pac NW
5,002 posts, read 12,358,226 times
Reputation: 4125

Advertisements

As a Boeing engineer I am proud of the products we make. I worked in both the commercial and the defense side of the company, and both are very impressive, commercial for scale and defense for know-how.

This brings me to a sobering moment though that despite all this, there is fierce competition on the horizon. Airbus has slowly gained market share since the 1970s, but the world is happy with a duopoly right now. On the horizon, however, there are some countries with promising aerospace industries in the making. China has publicly stated its nationalized aerospace firm AVIC 2 will attempt to compete in the 150-200 seat range. Honda has considered teaming with Kawasaki and Fuji HI to design, build, and develop planes in the same class as well as Embraer (Brazil) and Bombardier (Canada).

Boeing also has heritage for - and against - it. The unions basically have a stranglehold on how productive the factory can be, and any attempt at automating any portion of it is immediately scuttled by the union by its refusal to help it. There's an initiative that is called "lean" by trying to eliminate waste. The progress being made, however, is pathetic. Compared to other industrial giants like Caterpillar, the waste and inefficiency is staggering. As an example, I toured a Caterpillar plant in Illinois and there were 8 people TOTAL in a building half the size of the Everett plant. I was told there were 50 workers total tending to the machines which automatically took delivery of raw materials, forged them, purified them, machined parts, took inventory, did fine machining, and assembled everything. What happened when someone floated the idea of something like that for the 737 line, from a young machinst? He got fired by the union for "threatening jobs".

When I took a tour of the Everett factory I lost count of how many lazy union machinists I saw sitting around doing nothing. I've been on the factory floor working some issues and have frequently heard the machinists complain about having to do actual work, and even one who admitted to swiping his buddies' badges at the gate and signing in their computers to make it seem like they came to work, when they didn't! And what do they get? Some of them get paid better than the engineers! I worked on the 787 on the airplane working some of the software issues and lost count of how m any times I saw machinist union guys either blundering or purposefully delaying work done on the plane.

It makes me sick. This all brings me to the point that Boeing has serious trouble in the next 5-10 years as the emergent companies prove their products are safe. There's bright people all over the world and it saddens me to see another American giant fall because of the stupidity of their management and laziness of their unions.

It wil probably not happen in my time at the company, but I predict eventually Boeing will fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2009, 02:56 AM
 
Location: rain city
2,957 posts, read 12,724,336 times
Reputation: 4973
As an ex-Teamster, I sympathize with you completely. The corruption in the union and their idiotic scizophrenic workplace policies are indefensible.

In theory, I'm totally in favor of labor unions representing the interests of the common worker. In practice, US labor unions are the closest thing America has to organized crime. It's a wonder any business can stay afloat with what we currently know as union labor.

I say throw all the bums out and start all over again. Unions can be a good thing. In their contemporary US incarnation, they are self serving, money sucking, business killing, organized crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2009, 05:42 AM
 
9,618 posts, read 27,337,354 times
Reputation: 5382
Just curious, Esker:
The Machinists Union is hurting Boeing, you say....How about SPEEA, the engineer's union?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2009, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Seattle area
854 posts, read 4,140,829 times
Reputation: 527
When I was younger I didn't understand the whole union-thing -- all I heard was how you had to pay bribes to get things done in NY and stuff like that. WTF? Then I saw Far and Away -- I remember a scene in the chicken plant -- and it clicked. OH. That's why we need(ed) unions.

But where's the relevance now? Labor laws prevent the worst practices. I'm sure there are some nice things brought about by unions, but all I hear about are the abuses. Those bribes, if you want your booth to be set up at the show any time before the show begins, and no, you're not allowed to unload it yourself. They had to be factored into our small company's BUDGET. Or, my friend who worked at Kroger, who was pressured incessantly to join the union for CHECKERS. She didn't want her pay docked for the dues, but it became impossible to work there until she did, so she joined. (Then they went on strike and she lost even MORE pay).

But then there's evil, anti-union WalMart. I've seen them destroy more lives than I can count. (No, I don't shop there, and I didn't shop there even before moving here, and no, I'm not an activist against them because it's a hopeless cause). They don't have unions, and they treat their employees like sh*t. So, that's wrong too.

It is sad to move here thinking you're where they build all the best planes, and then see them cut down like this. It astonishes me how much money that someone with very little education and only a narrow mechincal skill can make. It's artificially inflated, just as it was in Detroit. Great jobs are a great thing, and I'm all for raising everyone's standard of living. But not at the cost of business in general, and it seems that greed is the driving role on every side. Employers' greed causes people to unionize. Union's greed bleeds the employer, sometimes to death. Greed greed greed greed. Sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2009, 09:25 AM
 
Location: US Empire, Pac NW
5,002 posts, read 12,358,226 times
Reputation: 4125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ira500 View Post
Just curious, Esker:
The Machinists Union is hurting Boeing, you say....How about SPEEA, the engineer's union?
SPEEA is not so much a blood-sucking monster the machinists' union is, however, it is just as useless in today's world.

One of the functions of a union is to prevent employers from exploiting the workers. Nowadays, labor laws prevents most of that. So then their thing now is to get the best benefits and protect jobs. Well, SPEEA doesn't do that at all. They have a rating system which basically constrains Boeing management in who they can fire (worst performers first, then middle, then if things are really bad, they cut the creme de la creme). Since Aerospace is such a "small" pool, if one employer pisses in the pool, people notice and remember. The skills needed are tough to learn for new engineers, so there is incentive to keep them. So what's the point of keeping SPEEA? If they had a vote for young adults in the company, I think they'd be decertified.

As for the benefits, I think they're doing an OK job. Mean wages for the different levels of experience in engineering are pretty much par for the course. Which means I'm squarely middle class in PS area, but that's a whole other axe I have to grind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2009, 11:38 AM
 
960 posts, read 1,162,846 times
Reputation: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by azoria View Post
In theory, I'm totally in favor of labor unions representing the interests of the common worker. In practice, US labor unions are the closest thing America has to organized crime.
Some unions, then I can agree. We don't hear much about the good ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2009, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,515,926 times
Reputation: 3899
It has nothing to do with the union...

it is ALL corporate greed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2009, 12:50 PM
 
Location: US Empire, Pac NW
5,002 posts, read 12,358,226 times
Reputation: 4125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
It has nothing to do with the union...

it is ALL greed.
Fixed. I think it is greed and laziness in general. China, Russia, Japan, and Brazil pose the biggest threats to Boeing (and to Airbus). And none of them have unions and they have their governments provide the political (and in China's case, the collective public will for a better life) will.

I agree unions, in principle, were meant in a bygone era there to protect the workers and provide living wages so that people aren't subject to unsafe work conditions and only get paid enough to live in abject poverty. But as I said before, labor laws prevent most of that now, so what is a union's function at Boeing? Every personal experience I've had, basically points to "The Union looks out for the Union, screw the company" which is the wrong approach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2009, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
746 posts, read 2,176,006 times
Reputation: 436
When a forklift driver makes more than a highly skilled DBA or engineer, well, that's just wrong. No matter how you look at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2009, 02:27 PM
 
960 posts, read 1,162,846 times
Reputation: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by eskercurve View Post
I agree unions, in principle, were meant in a bygone era there to protect the workers and provide living wages so that people aren't subject to unsafe work conditions and only get paid enough to live in abject poverty. But as I said before, labor laws prevent most of that now, so what is a union's function at Boeing?
Labor laws do nothing about wages beyond the minimum wage. Unions are still needed for collective bargaining in some cases. Just not bad ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top