Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 08-08-2013, 06:43 PM
 
361 posts, read 727,621 times
Reputation: 381

Advertisements

I filed a sexual harassment claim with the EEOC 3 months ago and they decided to forward it to their enforcement bureau. I have some questions regarding the process.

1- I received a letter today from the investigator, along with my ex-employer's response to the complaint. In the letter the investigator is asking me to provide a written response to employer's. I have already given them everything I had in the beginning of the case (my written statement, email copies, basically everything I had that was in relation with this claim...).
The Investigator is still asking me to provide my written response along with any supporting documents I may have. Is this the normal process?

2- I'm thinking about talking to a lawyer because in their response, they say that after receiving the first letter from the EEOC couple of months ago, they went back a did another investigation and interviewed my ex-manager (who is denying ever asking me out) and all the female-coworkers I worked with all denying him asking me out or witnessing anything though, they did witness everything.

3- I read their response and they may have a couple arguments in their favor. They are also saying that I did not follow their policy which was to contact a manager or HR when the incidents occur. I requested a transfer to another branch and I was put in contact with the District Manager who told me to write a statement and that I was going to be contacted by HR. I was never contacted and I had to quit because I couldn't stand the hostile environment. Before quitting, I emailed the DM asking if he could help speed up my transfer because of the difficult work environment at the time but he never replied. So, basically they are saying I didn't follow proper procedure because I didn't contact HR directly ( I didn't because I was scared of the repercussions) but I thought the DM was sort of part of HR. So could this argument lead the EEOC to cancel the claim?

Thanks!
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2013, 09:02 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,825 posts, read 81,804,326 times
Reputation: 58236
You will get far better results by hiring your own lawyer.
Quick reply to this message
 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top