Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2011, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,662,635 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

A new book by an economics professor at the University of Texas-Austin reveals what the world of advertising has known for decades - that beauty sells.
But Daniel S Hamermesh also shows that being attractive pays - with good looking employees enjoying more perks and higher pay packets than their plainer colleagues.


Read more: It pays to be pretty: Professor¿s 20-year study reveals good looking employees are paid more and get better perks | Mail Online
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2011, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Texas
632 posts, read 1,181,828 times
Reputation: 694
This guy was my professor (and a big time elitist) so I heard a lot about this study and guess what: this is common knowledge and not something that requires 20 years of research.

Wherever you go, good-looking people (women in my case) get treated differently than "ugly" people. Just the way it is in today's world. For example, if you are standing trial, it is statistically proven (based on an essay I wrote back in middle school) that convicts who are "good-looking" get lighter sentences than their uglier counterparts for the same crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,860,614 times
Reputation: 17840
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedRage View Post
This guy was my professor (and a big time elitist) so I heard a lot about this study and guess what: this is common knowledge and not something that requires 20 years of research.

Wherever you go, good-looking people (women in my case) get treated differently than "ugly" people. Just the way it is in today's world. For example, if you are standing trial, it is statistically proven (based on an essay I wrote back in middle school) that convicts who are "good-looking" get lighter sentences than their uglier counterparts for the same crime.
Since we already know this, we need to move on and get past this.

We need to be creative and learn how to seek revenge against good looking people. How can we stick it to them? Make it even.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,858 posts, read 24,982,405 times
Reputation: 28578
This required a 20 year study??? If only these people would research something of value maybe our country wouldn't be going down the toilet
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 06:24 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,191,695 times
Reputation: 12921
It's common knowledge, but now you can use some qualified research when discussing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Ayrsley
4,713 posts, read 9,713,811 times
Reputation: 3824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
We need to be creative and learn how to seek revenge against good looking people.
Speak for yourself.

Crap like this is why I decided to ditch a career in academia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Texas
632 posts, read 1,181,828 times
Reputation: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
This required a 20 year study??? If only these people would research something of value maybe our country wouldn't be going down the toilet
This is why I didn't like my professor (among other things). Why waste 20 years on something most people already knew. Why not use your knowledge of economics to figure out what we need to do as a nation to get out of the slump we're in and get people working again?

On a side note, he also caused a bit of a controversy with Texas State University by implying that UT Austin should receive a bulk of the state aid because it was a school where the "best and brightest in the state" went to while schools like Texas State and UH did not deserve to be Tier One nor receive state aid because it was basically a lower tier school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 12:35 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,191,695 times
Reputation: 12921
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedRage View Post
This is why I didn't like my professor (among other things). Why waste 20 years on something most people already knew. Why not use your knowledge of economics to figure out what we need to do as a nation to get out of the slump we're in and get people working again?

On a side note, he also caused a bit of a controversy with Texas State University by implying that UT Austin should receive a bulk of the state aid because it was a school where the "best and brightest in the state" went to while schools like Texas State and UH did not deserve to be Tier One nor receive state aid because it was basically a lower tier school.
It's not a waste. It could very well have resulted in findings in which we all thought we knew, but were wrong about. There's a valid reason for concluding something by way of research even if we think we know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 12:39 PM
 
977 posts, read 1,817,254 times
Reputation: 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
It's not a waste. It could very well have resulted in findings in which we all thought we knew, but were wrong about. There's a valid reason for concluding something by way of research even if we think we know.
Yep. Sometimes things that seem obvious are found out to be wrong through research. Although in this case, there have been others studies on the beauty premium so maybe it was a waste.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 01:06 PM
 
Location: NC
1,225 posts, read 2,423,226 times
Reputation: 673
not too mention more likely to get hired etc..Wow, newsflash here!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top