Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I support intervention in Syria. The situation is terrible there, and if the government really have used chemical weapons, it's completely below the belt. I would send our fighters there if it was possible.
There's no appetite at all here for intervention. People haven't forgotten Iraq and how shambolic that was, and the reputation the UK garnered after doing so. Sadly, if we do go, we're America's poodle, and if we don't, we're weak and diminished. We can't win! Oh well, might as well just sit on the sidelines and let France handle it.
Sorry love but they aren't going to be handling anything.
I was joking. Of course they're not going to handle anything on their own, but they'll be America's new European ally in this venture, and we'll take a backseat. Works for me.
The US has nothing to gain in Syria. Iraq was a completely different thing. This is more like the Libyan intervention to depose Ghaddafi.
The Germans won't participate, I think they decided today, or was it yesterday. And like us, they have legal issues in these kind of things. Wonder why Italy is able to participate as they like.
I don't mean to be rude but the germans or whatever will never participate. Most of the big wars in the modern world are powered by the UK and the USA not europe and USA.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.