Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I thought that had more to do with humidity, in which case it would have the reverse effect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex985
Wawa1992 would answer this question a lot better than me since he lives in the area, but the three logical posibilities I have is:
A.) Longer period of record than surrounding areas, but that doesn't seem likely since Nashville's "extremes" are from 1871.
B.) Flatter terrain in Bowling Green, allowing the level ground around it to heat up more and cool down more? Notice how record lows are lower too.
C.) Different soil type in BG versus Nashville. But I highly doubt this too.
Most likely B then. Nashville has a longer POR than Bowling Green.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
