Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
B) Subtropical (warm end of subtropical) New Orleans with very high standard deviations in winter (yes, i know their winter averages are way higher than London but they are far more prone to cold snaps and extreme weather).
I pick New Orleans. Stormier in general, with greater winter precipitation amounts and a higher standard deviation of temperatures in winter. The ingredients are more conducive to it, in my view, as it's near a warm body of water to provide sufficient moisture, but can still be penetrated by arctic air masses to allow for that precipitation to occasionally fall as snow.
The Pacific Northwest (Victoria, Vancouver, Seattle) is nearly snowless but capable of a 2 foot snowstorm. London is somewhat similar to those cities, but there are some differences. But I'd lean towards London. It's hard to judge since London doesn't have snowfall stats.
Houston got almost 2 feet from an 1899 storm. New Orleans only 4 inches, though. Could have just been the storm's path rather than anything climate specific:
Anybody with common sense would know that London is the answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei
Houston got almost 2 feet from an 1899 storm. New Orleans only 4 inches, though. Could have just been the storm's path rather than anything climate specific:
I would say London by a margin. Maybe a very strong Lake Effect with north easterly winds could bring such large amounts of snow.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.