Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which climate is more likely to get a freak blizzard with 2 feet of snow?
London 19 76.00%
New Orleans 6 24.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2014, 08:58 PM
 
Location: HERE
2,043 posts, read 3,885,982 times
Reputation: 597

Advertisements

Which climate is more likely to get a freak blizzard with 2 feet of snow?


A) Oceanic London with cool, cloudy, and rainy winters and low standard deviations.

London - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

or

B) Subtropical (warm end of subtropical) New Orleans with very high standard deviations in winter (yes, i know their winter averages are way higher than London but they are far more prone to cold snaps and extreme weather).

New Orleans - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2014, 09:02 PM
 
3,586 posts, read 4,971,104 times
Reputation: 969
Judging by snowy days I'd say London.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2014, 09:13 PM
 
Location: South Jersey
14,497 posts, read 9,428,386 times
Reputation: 5251
I pick New Orleans. Stormier in general, with greater winter precipitation amounts and a higher standard deviation of temperatures in winter. The ingredients are more conducive to it, in my view, as it's near a warm body of water to provide sufficient moisture, but can still be penetrated by arctic air masses to allow for that precipitation to occasionally fall as snow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2014, 09:17 PM
 
Location: In transition
10,635 posts, read 16,694,364 times
Reputation: 5248
I think I'll go with London by a small margin...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2014, 10:20 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,454,351 times
Reputation: 15184
The Pacific Northwest (Victoria, Vancouver, Seattle) is nearly snowless but capable of a 2 foot snowstorm. London is somewhat similar to those cities, but there are some differences. But I'd lean towards London. It's hard to judge since London doesn't have snowfall stats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2014, 10:22 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,454,351 times
Reputation: 15184
Houston got almost 2 feet from an 1899 storm. New Orleans only 4 inches, though. Could have just been the storm's path rather than anything climate specific:

Weather Extremes : Snowstorms in the South: An Historical Perspective | Weather Underground
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2014, 11:24 PM
 
Location: A subtropical paradise
2,068 posts, read 2,921,841 times
Reputation: 1359
Anybody with common sense would know that London is the answer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Houston got almost 2 feet from an 1899 storm. New Orleans only 4 inches, though. Could have just been the storm's path rather than anything climate specific:

Weather Extremes : Snowstorms in the South: An Historical Perspective | Weather Underground
It was the storms path, nothing more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 12:26 AM
B87
 
Location: Surrey/London
11,769 posts, read 10,591,349 times
Reputation: 3099
Neither of these cities have ever recorded 2ft/60cm of snow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 12:39 AM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,651 posts, read 12,943,861 times
Reputation: 6381
London will still win due to its proximity to the north pole.

New Orleans is too southwards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 04:28 AM
 
Location: Bremerhaven, NW Germany
2,714 posts, read 3,042,876 times
Reputation: 934
I would say London by a margin. Maybe a very strong Lake Effect with north easterly winds could bring such large amounts of snow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top