Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
While Arctic Ice (Not Antarctic) is at its lowest level at this moment I believe, we shouldn't ignore the past. Looks like in 1947 there was some crazy enough warming that they were "alarming" us back then too.. Wonder if we all died after that or if it just refroze.
While Arctic Ice (Not Antarctic) is at its lowest level at this moment I believe, we shouldn't ignore the past. Looks like in 1947 there was some crazy enough warming that they were "alarming" us back then too.. Wonder if we all died after that or if it just refroze.
Fun and interesting until they get to the end and forecast "best case" optimistic" and "current path" scenarios. All of which are bull****. No clue as to what the global temps will look like in 84 years
Fun and interesting until they get to the end and forecast "best case" optimistic" and "current path" scenarios. All of which are bull****. No clue as to what the global temps will look like in 84 years
Exactly.. I said the same thing to myself.. Just another way to draw attention to the fear monger agenda. Such a great tool with history and graph yet so unfortunate. Makes us not even discuss the history or work put into this.. That's why I wasn't commenting. They couldn't just leave it as is at current.
Oh you people, the point is that the rate of change (forget the forecast) in the last century has been faster than ever in human history.
What, less than 2°F in last century? Gimme a break. Took 100 years to rise 1°C??
I wish we had detailed records of way back in the past rather than just Tree rings and Ice cores which don't capture details like the swings within 25-100yrs of weather and climate.
What, less than 2°F in last century? Gimme a break. Took 100 years to rise 1°C??
I wish we had detailed records of way back in the past rather than just Tree rings and Ice cores which don't capture details like the swings within 25-100yrs of weather and climate.
What used to take half a millennium happened in just 100 years, that's a lot faster.
Fun and interesting until they get to the end and forecast "best case" optimistic" and "current path" scenarios. All of which are bull****. No clue as to what the global temps will look like in 84 years
yep, that pisses me off. the regressive, civilization-hating fear-mongers should ****. What they'd really like is a return to some type of hunter-gatherer society. not gonna happen. global warming is a fact - but the only viable solution is geo-engineering, not cutting down emissions of fossil fuels. the sooner they understand this the better.
What used to take half a millennium happened in just 100 years, that's a lot faster.
Don't bother arguing with them. They'll come to their senses when half of Bridgeport city center gets flooded every time the tide comes in.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
