Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-22-2011, 07:40 PM
 
71 posts, read 269,445 times
Reputation: 34

Advertisements

Is this true?

Congress Implements 2012 Unemployment Extension Benefits, Announces Unemployment-Extension.Org (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/11/22/prweb8986325.DTL - broken link)

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-22-2011, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,576 posts, read 56,460,696 times
Reputation: 23378
At this point, I'm calling it bogus. Not a credible source. Nothing in the NYT, WSJ or at NELP - or when I google.

The 'article' is a nonsensical regurgitation of nonspecifics and old news. Implement is different from introduce. Congress has introduced legislation, but has not implemented it. Article says implement, but later states Congress 'looks for a 2012 extension.'

The article says WI and is one of the highest unemployment states. It is NOT. WI current rate is 7.8% and triggered off Tier IV and HUP long ago. CA at 12%, NV at 13.3, MS at 10%, MI @ 11%. All much worse, and no mention.

Not credible.


Extensions may happen, but last I heard earlier today GOP wants offsets before they approve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2011, 08:43 PM
 
71 posts, read 269,445 times
Reputation: 34
Thanks for clarifying. I thought it was a little weird.

Can you explain a little bit more, too, what you meant by your last sentence? I really would like to educate myself a little more. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2011, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,576 posts, read 56,460,696 times
Reputation: 23378
Quote:
Originally Posted by emma1329 View Post
Can you explain a little bit more, too, what you meant by your last sentence?
GOP have always used approval of unemployment benefits as a trade-off for something they want. Last year it was an extension of the Bush tax cuts. Right now they are saying they are in favor of an extension (we still don't know in what form) if benefits are 'paid for.' In other words, another program needs to be cut to pay for the benefits. GOP and some Dems now say they do not want to borrow money from China to do this.

Something will most likely get done eventually. Whether or not it will happen before the end of the year is unknown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2011, 09:41 PM
 
Location: home state of Myrtle Beach!
6,896 posts, read 22,519,774 times
Reputation: 4565
Darn, was hopeful it would happen before Black Friday so all those people would know they could possibly afford to spend money on Christmas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2011, 09:46 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,964,008 times
Reputation: 7315
My bet is an extension is passed by year end, but with fewer tiers. Admin lacks the trading card tax cuts brought, plus for those favoring extensions, 2 yrs tax cuts for 1 year ui left a one year "uh oh" gap w/o a big trading incentive to offer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2011, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,576 posts, read 56,460,696 times
Reputation: 23378
bobtn is right. It will be cut back. Or, if there is an extension, it will only be until end of February, when they will need to revisit the issue again. Did that numerous times in 2010. Y'all heard Newt Gingrich - "take a bath and get a job." He's not alone in that view. Many believe whomever wants a job can find one. So, the program will be cut at some point.

Last edited by Ariadne22; 11-22-2011 at 10:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2011, 11:33 PM
 
71 posts, read 269,445 times
Reputation: 34
Wow, this is so helpful. Thanks for sharing this info.

So it looks like people are anticipating some sort of more limited extension before the end of the year then? Better than nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2011, 06:15 AM
C.C
 
2,235 posts, read 2,362,394 times
Reputation: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
At this point, I'm calling it bogus. Not a credible source. Nothing in the NYT, WSJ or at NELP - or when I google.

The 'article' is a nonsensical regurgitation of nonspecifics and old news. Implement is different from introduce. Congress has introduced legislation, but has not implemented it. Article says implement, but later states Congress 'looks for a 2012 extension.'

The article says WI and is one of the highest unemployment states. It is NOT. WI current rate is 7.8% and triggered off Tier IV and HUP long ago. CA at 12%, NV at 13.3, MS at 10%, MI @ 11%. All much worse, and no mention.

Not credible.


Extensions may happen, but last I heard earlier today GOP wants offsets before they approve.
And I'm sure there's a good reason for them to collect your personal info before redirecting you to the authentic state site where you can enter it again!

This garbage "news" was even linked on Yahoo. In that version it claims that the BLS is reporting 13.7M people collecting unemployment! The correct DOL (http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/current.htm - broken link) number is 6.8M.

Last edited by C.C; 11-23-2011 at 06:28 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2011, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,576 posts, read 56,460,696 times
Reputation: 23378
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.C View Post
And I'm sure there's a good reason for them to collect your personal info before redirecting you to the authentic state site where you can enter it again!

This garbage "news" was even linked on Yahoo. In that version it claims that the BLS is reporting 13.7M people collecting unemployment! The correct DOL (http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/current.htm - broken link) number is 6.8M.
You got the word right - garbage.

Beware the wild and woolly internet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top