Quote:
Originally Posted by scaramouchebluez
Well yes its a cover for prostitution but the fact you are trying to prostitute while circumventing prostitution laws doesn't make you morally right, it actually makes you morally WRONG. In her case if she didn't intend to have sex with him and took his money all she had to do was give the money back, but she tried to rob him clearly sex was expected so he shot her for trying to steal. It is justified because stealing is always more wrong than killing a thief, he was justified. Had she just been straight forward and not try to steal she'd still be alive. ![OK](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/oglvvd.gif)
|
I think the only reason you are pleased she is dead is because she was a prostitute.
IF a pizza delivery guy comes to your house with $150 worth of pizzas (Here in Australia a large pizza costs roughly $15-25, more if you want special toppings), takes your money and then you open the boxes and realise that it was missing special toppings or anything else you specifically asked for, would you say that it gave you the right to KILL the pizza delivery guy? NO!
An why the heck are CIVILIANS allowed to have assault rifles?