Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-02-2014, 05:56 PM
 
365 posts, read 779,700 times
Reputation: 350

Advertisements

It looks like Alameda County taxpayers are going to be asked to double the transit portion of the sales tax for BART improvements. I wonder if the other BART counties will be asked to do so as well.

BART board pulls no-strike measure after unions waver on tax - SFGate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-02-2014, 10:14 PM
 
655 posts, read 1,983,381 times
Reputation: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by bay2bay View Post
It looks like Alameda County taxpayers are going to be asked to double the transit portion of the sales tax for BART improvements. I wonder if the other BART counties will be asked to do so as well.

BART board pulls no-strike measure after unions waver on tax - SFGate
The Alameda sales tax that they're talking about (a reauthorization of the current Measure B) is not just for BART; it supports all modes of transportation in the county, from road improvements to bike/ped improvements to bus and rail (which also includes ACE, the ferries, the Tri-Valley transit agencies, and AC Transit, in addition to BART). Some of the money also passes directly to cities for their own transportation programs.

The issue with BART was just that their support was critical with the sales tax going to the ballot again given that BART to Livermore and Irvington BART are projects likely to be included, in addition to non-BART transit projects like Dumbarton Rail and AC Transit BRT projects and many non-transit projects (e.g., fixing the I-80 Gilman interchange, upgrading 880 to reduce congestion, completing the Bay Trail and East Bay Greenway within Alameda County, etc.). The tax extension was very narrowly defeated in 2012, so the support of every city and agency involved is important to have and retain.

I wouldn't expect anything to change in the other BART counties; they all already have their own transportation sales taxes in place, and none of those sunset until the 2030s. (Alameda's current tax sunsets relatively soon and all of the projects that were part of the last authorization have already been completed, which is why it's going back to the ballot for a reauthorization.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 07:20 AM
 
365 posts, read 779,700 times
Reputation: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by artemis78 View Post
The Alameda sales tax that they're talking about (a reauthorization of the current Measure B) is not just for BART; it supports all modes of transportation in the county, from road improvements to bike/ped improvements to bus and rail (which also includes ACE, the ferries, the Tri-Valley transit agencies, and AC Transit, in addition to BART). Some of the money also passes directly to cities for their own transportation programs.

The issue with BART was just that their support was critical with the sales tax going to the ballot again given that BART to Livermore and Irvington BART are projects likely to be included, in addition to non-BART transit projects like Dumbarton Rail and AC Transit BRT projects and many non-transit projects (e.g., fixing the I-80 Gilman interchange, upgrading 880 to reduce congestion, completing the Bay Trail and East Bay Greenway within Alameda County, etc.). The tax extension was very narrowly defeated in 2012, so the support of every city and agency involved is important to have and retain.

I wouldn't expect anything to change in the other BART counties; they all already have their own transportation sales taxes in place, and none of those sunset until the 2030s. (Alameda's current tax sunsets relatively soon and all of the projects that were part of the last authorization have already been completed, which is why it's going back to the ballot for a reauthorization.)
Thank you for clarifying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top