Windcrest and the Walzem & Rittiman areas

[allmyexes]

Certain there are good people there. What this gentlemen is saying is that the good are FAR outweighed by the BAD

[jameshardin]

Wow, your analysis is very thorough!

I agree with other posters on here in endorsing Windcrest proper to be a very nice area. Property values are great, and you don't pay any city taxes. The homes are typically very nice. I have sold some really wonderful ranch style homes with spacious lots. I would have no problem living in Windcrest (I live across I-35 from it).

Camelot - I am not a fan of Camelot at all, and most people that I speak to who are residents are unhappy. The property values are horrible, many of the residents cannot be bothered to tend to their property, and the crime rates are very high (I don't have stats to back this up, just hearsay). I would avoid this at all cost, when you can get a property for a similar price towards converse and Kirby.

I like the Royal Ridge area, most of the homes are very well kept, and the Townhomes / Condos are kept towards the front of the area, so that the single family homes are all in a suburban atmosphere.

[ZacharyDY4]

I know some people in Camelot II, one of them has lived there since her house was new. She was telling me the neighborhood was supposed to have a nice pond and park and all this in it but Ray Ellison wound up selling the houses they couldn't sell to rental companies by the dozen and got the heck outta there! Camelot I, which is between Walzem and Eisenhauer, seems to be a nicer area but it has single family homes, not duplexes and rowhouses. A lot of these apartment complexes are still horrible, especially Springhill, but some of them are being turned around (Fairdale and Cobblestone seem to have new owners that are doing wonders with them, and new management at Goldfield is trying though I doubt they're getting very far)