Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sandra Bullock belongs in that category too. She can't act, I personally don't find her attractive, and she hasn't had a hit movie in over a decade. Yet somehow, she keeps getting offered millions to do bad romantic comedies that get bad reviews and don't make a lot of money.
Sandra Bullock has that girl next door look which many people find appealing. She's not a beauty queen by any measure, just a plain girl in the neighborhood who grew up to be pretty. I beg to differ on the hit movie. She's had one this year (The Proposal), and looks like she might have another hit coming out in November.
I am glad I am not the only one who thinks a girls face is more important then the body. If a girl has an okay body I can live with that but an ugly face no way. I guess I have seen to many girls with nice bodies but below average faces.
If I had to choose between the two, I would choose a pretty face. Wouldn't have to be "perfect" or "gorgeous", just pretty. It could be just her eyes, or lips, or cute little nose, or a beautiful smile.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.