Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-30-2016, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Louisville, KY
129 posts, read 118,993 times
Reputation: 329

Advertisements

Sorry, folks -- I haven't logged in for a while. What people don't get is that when the Big One hits -- and it will, eventually -- it won't be like the SF or LA quakes, which have been comparatively localized. It will devastate the entire region. If you survive (which most people will), and if you're prepared with supplies (which some people are), what about your job? How will people here make a living when their places of business have been destroyed? In the worst-case scenario, you won't be able to leave because much of the infrastructure will have been destroyed. The PNW will go into recession for years, if not decades. I did some research, and I read a convincing case that, if some of the Columbia River dams fail, the entire Western power grid will be affected, so even moving to Bend won't protect you from the consequences.

There's always a worst case, though, and the worst case might not happen during our lifetimes. My wife and I love the PNW. I spent 25 years in the South, and they're dealing with drought, brutal summers, and wildfires. We have family here in the PNW. We're nearing retirement age, so the probability window for an M9 quake for us is narrowing. We probably will stay here and take our chances. We live in Beaverton, and someone pointed out that FEMA is going to help Portland, Beaverton, Hillsboro, and the other highly populated areas before they help more rural areas. My point is that you need to evaluate your own situation, where you are in life, what your risk tolerance is, and make an informed decision. If I were 25, I'd probably leave the region. At 58, I'm more likely to take my chances.

 
Old 12-01-2016, 05:42 AM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,643 posts, read 48,015,234 times
Reputation: 78406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lapaki View Post
......... someone pointed out that FEMA is going to help Portland, Beaverton, Hillsboro, ............
Well, you can cross your fingers and hope because whenever there is any sort of natural disaster in Oregon, FEMA never shows up.

A small town in the Willamette valley was reduced to toothpicks by a tornado and all that came from Washington was that they wouldn't offer any help because not enough homes were destroyed.

With extreme flooding or extreme snowfall, the Oregon National Guard will occasionally be out helping, but nothing from Washington. No FEMA, no disaster designation, no low cost federal loans for repairs.
 
Old 12-01-2016, 11:43 AM
 
4 posts, read 3,162 times
Reputation: 14
This New Yorker article is good to read.

The Earthquake That Will Devastate the Pacific Northwest

It even pointed out the exact time of the last big earthquake.

Finally, in a 1996 article in Nature, a seismologist named Kenji Satake and three colleagues, drawing on the work of Atwater and Yamaguchi, matched that orphan to its parent—and thereby filled in the blanks in the Cascadia story with uncanny specificity. At approximately nine o’ clock at night on January 26, 1700, a magnitude-9.0 earthquake struck the Pacific Northwest, causing sudden land subsidence, drowning coastal forests, and, out in the ocean, lifting up a wave half the length of a continent. It took roughly fifteen minutes for the Eastern half of that wave to strike the Northwest coast. It took ten hours for the other half to cross the ocean. It reached Japan on January 27, 1700: by the local calendar, the eighth day of the twelfth month of the twelfth year of Genroku.
 
Old 12-01-2016, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Happy Valley
23 posts, read 37,933 times
Reputation: 42
I wasn't really worried until this last weeks Oregon coast earthquakes. I have an emergency bag ready if ANYTHING happens but I don't think it is going to be severe enough to really harm the coastline && Oregon & Washington the way the news is suggesting. My thing is, it is better to be prepared than not.
 
Old 12-02-2016, 12:37 PM
 
Location: The beautiful Rogue Valley, Oregon
7,785 posts, read 18,823,925 times
Reputation: 10783
Quote:
Originally Posted by TailorJohnson View Post
I wasn't really worried until this last weeks Oregon coast earthquakes. I have an emergency bag ready if ANYTHING happens but I don't think it is going to be severe enough to really harm the coastline && Oregon & Washington the way the news is suggesting. My thing is, it is better to be prepared than not.
It IS always best to be prepared, I agree.

But earthquakes are pretty common here: a compiled list of earthquakes above 5.0 (roughly):
Historic earthquakes

the seismic recording equipment to pick up and pinpoint offshore quakes didn't really go in until the 70s, so there are probably offshore quakes not on this list - hence some of the earthquakes in the 1950s and earlier on the list that say "felt in the Portland area."
 
Old 12-03-2016, 10:42 AM
 
13 posts, read 13,736 times
Reputation: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by bachfanwang View Post
This New Yorker article is good to read.

The Earthquake That Will Devastate the Pacific Northwest

It even pointed out the exact time of the last big earthquake.

Finally, in a 1996 article in Nature, a seismologist named Kenji Satake and three colleagues, drawing on the work of Atwater and Yamaguchi, matched that orphan to its parent—and thereby filled in the blanks in the Cascadia story with uncanny specificity. At approximately nine o’ clock at night on January 26, 1700, a magnitude-9.0 earthquake struck the Pacific Northwest, causing sudden land subsidence, drowning coastal forests, and, out in the ocean, lifting up a wave half the length of a continent. It took roughly fifteen minutes for the Eastern half of that wave to strike the Northwest coast. It took ten hours for the other half to cross the ocean. It reached Japan on January 27, 1700: by the local calendar, the eighth day of the twelfth month of the twelfth year of Genroku.

This article was the most well written, informative, educational, and frightening, thing I have read in a long time, as relates to me, and the fact I live here! Uh...I want to leave now! YIKES!

Thanks for that article. Made me want to be a geologist or seismologist! And made me ask my husband "Any job openings within your company at other locations?" He said "I could go to China tomorrow" Hmm...earthquake study on China now...

Thanks again, great article.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,072 posts, read 7,505,741 times
Reputation: 9796
I'd be more worried with volcanoes, laars, ash falls, and disturbed dragons.
 
Old 12-08-2016, 08:51 AM
 
125 posts, read 153,351 times
Reputation: 120
So, located in the Appalachian Mountains ... I heard about this one on NPR today: Earthquake - Magnitude 6.5 - OFF COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA - 2016 December 08, 14:49:47 UTC - That's right at bottom of the Juan De Fuca Plate - off the coast of Mendocino Ridge...

Some have asked if numerous quakes in 'the area' might alleviate stress and lesson the 'big one.' A Geologist said no, that the plate has a magnitude of stress on it far surpassing even 'a series' of smaller quakes.

Sure wish my family were out of there, too... My feeling is, the brightest folks in Oregon will sell out now (Now), take their inflated profits and head for solid ground. Otherwise ...good luck ~
 
Old 12-08-2016, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Left coast
2,320 posts, read 1,868,785 times
Reputation: 3261
All I can say I am so grateful I didn't sell outa California 20 years ago (like my florida relatives kept pressuring us to do)...
Circumstances did change and here I am-
I am good here for another 20- and if people are getting out d/t earthquake threats- that leaves more room for the rest of us!
 
Old 12-08-2016, 01:30 PM
 
Location: The beautiful Rogue Valley, Oregon
7,785 posts, read 18,823,925 times
Reputation: 10783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregone View Post
So, located in the Appalachian Mountains ... I heard about this one on NPR today: Earthquake - Magnitude 6.5 - OFF COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA - 2016 December 08, 14:49:47 UTC - That's right at bottom of the Juan De Fuca Plate - off the coast of Mendocino Ridge...

Some have asked if numerous quakes in 'the area' might alleviate stress and lesson the 'big one.' A Geologist said no, that the plate has a magnitude of stress on it far surpassing even 'a series' of smaller quakes.

Sure wish my family were out of there, too... My feeling is, the brightest folks in Oregon will sell out now (Now), take their inflated profits and head for solid ground. Otherwise ...good luck ~
Actually it was on the Gorda, a good distance south of the Juan de Fuca and the Blanco fracture zone.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorda_Plate

these are frequent, even at that magnitude.
(public domain image)


Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top