Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is it because they don't understand the other amendments, or that they don't agree with them. If you can't spell Constition, how could you possibly support it?
Wow! Really? Where in the Constitution does it say the gov't has to power to force me to buy something. You libs reinvent the Constitution as you deem fit. Tea Party are Constitutionalists, not collectivists.
Wow! Really? Where in the Constitution does it say the gov't has to power to force me to buy something. You libs reinvent the Constitution as you deem fit. Tea Party are Constitutionalists, not collectivists.
What other group carries around signs that read "Protek our Constition" "Dont take our freedums", all the while has little regard or understanding of it. Many people cherry pick the constitution, few claim to be liberatarians.
Yes they aren't the only ones guilty, however. I call this national phenomena the "Selective attention deficit disorder". Cherry picking the constitution doesn't work for anyone. Worse yet, it has the opposite effect.
And you, being from Norway, understand the Constitution? Sure. You have no clue what our Constitution is about or what it means.
Is it because they don't understand the other amendments, or that they don't agree with them. If you can't spell Constition, how could you possibly support it?
No context, no proof, just a slightly trollish sounding off handed assertion?
The only reason I'm even responding is to ask people who start a thread to have something constructive to say, to offer some context with which to work from. In other words, offer something beyond an OP's first post that is akin to passing gas in a crowded elevator.
No context, no proof, just a slightly trollish sounding off handed assertion?
The only reason I'm even responding is to ask people who start a thread to have something constructive to say, to offer some context with which to work from. In other words, offer something beyond an OP's first post that is akin to passing gas in a crowded elevator.
Thank you! Agree completely. Getting sooo tired of threads with gratuitous use of 'Tea Party' in title, for the sole purpose of having yet another thread to simply bash them.
Seriously, for all you Tea Party haters...start one big, all inclusive thread...call it the 'Why I Hate the Tea Party' thread. Fill it with plenty-o-pix of misspelled signs, crazy ladies with tea bag hats. Talk about how they don't understand the consitition/constipation (gee, that's a knee slapper every time). Really, have at it.
Now, if you have anything substantial to discuss...well, that would be a refreshing change.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sure. You have no clue what our Constitution is about or what it means.
I thought the same thing, I don't think that was on purpose but of course the OP will claim it was.
