Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How can this be? Something must be wrong here
[/LEFT]
GS is to the world of Finance as MIT is to the world of Engineering. To be skeptical of GS background in the Executive Branches financial functions, would be similar to being skeptical of MIT background of large Engineering firms or Courts having a background related to Harvard. Please, get real.
GS is to the world of Finance as MIT is to the world of Engineering. To be skeptical of GS background in the Executive Branches financial functions, would be similar to being skeptical of MIT background of large Engineering firms or Courts having a background related to Harvard. Please, get real.
Way to be in Denial.
Great thread JADEX was just about to post my self.
GS is to the world of Finance as MIT is to the world of Engineering. To be skeptical of GS background in the Executive Branches financial functions, would be similar to being skeptical of MIT background of large Engineering firms or Courts having a background related to Harvard. Please, get real.
Only a fool would ignore the fact that GS is in the Executive office at the very same time GS is recording record profits, getting low cost government loans, in the mist of a federal investigation, and federal proposals are being made to discuss legislating GS and other similar financial corporations.
Really, do you think we're all gullible enough to believe this spin?
Only a fool would ignore the fact that GS is in the Executive office at the very same time GS is recording record profits, getting low cost government loans, in the mist of a federal investigation, and federal proposals are being made to discuss legislating GS and other similar financial corporations.
This is similar to the Bush kissing the oil tycoon outrage..
What large financial institution is not recording high profits, not getting low cost federal loans and not being investigated?
Thats not the topic.. The topic is their connection to the Democrats. You can make excuses for it, but that doesnt mean the connection isnt there.
p.s. is ANY other firm being investigated by the Obama administration?
GS has long been the preeminent Financial firm in the Industry. Most of the best qualified people went there and still do. It is no wonder that the most talent is from GS. As to other firms being looked at, perhaps a look at the facts will help.
GS has long been the preeminent Financial firm in the Industry. Most of the best qualified people went there and still do. It is no wonder that the most talent is from GS. As to other firms being looked at, perhaps a look at the facts will help.
Yeah yeah, we get it.. First you make excuses for Democrats, and when that argument fails, its now both parties.
PS, your link doesnt support your argument. it diescusses companies that deal with CDO's, but it doesnt list any of them under investigation.
I guess then, that you don't think an investigation takes place until a suit is filed?? OooKay. I have never said Dems are immune from Wall Street money. Last month Repubs got $167,500 from GS and Dems got $123,000. They both get money from Corporations, that's certainly nothing new and not likely to change.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
