Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
again, the liberal who would do anything to keep thier candidate in office. Wouldn't you rather see your party win because they have done such a good job, than win because the other side had a better candidate. Your attitude is sad. I want a positive, great President, not one that wins because they are the best of the bad....
Nita
We do have a good positive President. I'm just presenting a warning to the GOP primary voters.
Palin ticket = Landslide Obama re-election
Same with the other right wing conservatives. Gingrich, Ryan, Cornyn, Perry, etc. Because it is possible to cede an election by running a candidate, and it looks like the GOP is setting themselves up for it based on this NY-23 fiasco.
Lie, whine, manipulate, take no responsibility, dont try to learn, blame others for your mistakes? Oh, and quit.
"Hey, Virginia voters, buy my book!"
That's really no different than the Chicago values of bully, manipulate, lie, cheat, steal, lie some more, steal some more that we get from BO and his cronies.
That's really no different than the Chicago values of bully, manipulate, lie, cheat, steal, lie some more, steal some more that we get from BO and his cronies.
"Hey, American voters, buy my BS!"
So you admit Palin is nothing more than BS, thanks for clearing that up.
Casper
I guess she really is a pitbull with lipstick running through the neighborhood, terrorizing the neighbor's cats and dogs and chasing the children back in the house. The republicans left the front gate open in the yard when they left the white house. I'll be glad when republican animal control shows up and puts her back on the leash.
So you admit Palin is nothing more than BS, thanks for clearing that up.
Casper
What I was getting at, is that the post I was responding to was very hypocritical if they think that way. Accept one and not the other? I wasn't reinforcing what they said, just pointing out their hypocrisy.
What I was getting at, is that the post I was responding to was very hypocritical if they think that way. Accept one and not the other? I wasn't reinforcing what they said, just pointing out their hypocrisy.
And McDonnell dis-invited her to Virginia. What's your point?
Sarah just wants to be able to claim some part of McDonnell's victory when in fact if she would actively campaign for him, Deeds would win.
I think that something very revealing is taking place here. 18 posts in this thing right now and not one person has indicated he/she read that link from the OP. Let me show you the last part of that thing so you don't have to go to the link and read the article.
CORRECTION: The Faith and Freedom Coalition passes on cleaner audio of the call, which makes clear that Palin tells listeners to "vote to share our principles," not vote "for Sarah's principles" as had been earlier reported.
I find it somewhat less than humorous that so many just grab onto the title, which was falsely posted if the poster read the article before posting it. Folks taking the words of anyone without reading the article will often lead to all kinds of crap like I saw up to now here.
The article does not ever show what all here have been talking about. Read the damned articles before you go off half-cocked.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
