Quote:
Originally Posted by cleanhouse
Never happen. Obama is now learning how the secretive Government works. There can be no such thing as transparency. This is all in the NWO handbook.
|
There is transparency and then there is transparency.
Just like a headline grabbing murder, we read the horrendous details but do we really need to see the crime scene photos, I think not. What purpose does it serve other than to satisfy our somewhat morbid curiosity?
Now before anyone start jumping up and down that this is some double standard, I dropped my subscription to Salon as a result of their publication of previously unpublished Abu Ghraib photographs because I couldn't for the life of me understand the purpose. I, like many, were outrage enough about the initial photographs so I didn't see how their publication would result in making me more outraged or how my increased level of outrageousness would result in a different outcome.
So what is to be gained vs what is to be lost?