Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:31 AM
 
4,459 posts, read 4,218,288 times
Reputation: 648

Advertisements

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/24/op...tue1.html?_r=1

I certainly do not see repugs gaining any seats in the next election cycle of 2010, this is for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:33 AM
 
Location: New York, New York
4,906 posts, read 6,858,704 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukester View Post
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/24/op...tue1.html?_r=1

I certainly do not see repugs gaining any seats in the next election cycle of 2010, this is for sure.
They are scrambling worse than I ever dreamed. The funny part is they make the same mistakes over again. Its like watching ground hog day. Where did I see that used recently?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:43 AM
 
4,459 posts, read 4,218,288 times
Reputation: 648
Obama is truly the best president this country has seen in a generation. He has accomplished more in 30 days than Bush did in 8 years, unbelievable. I really think the GOP do not know how to deal with Obama because of his amazing multitasking capabilities and his organizational skills which are just phenomenal. I don't think Bush could walk and chew gum at the same time,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:47 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,589,742 times
Reputation: 8075
According to what the article said and Governor Jindal, if these states' governors changed their state's rules and accepted the money then the state would be forced to pay out over time a larger sum than they received and thus loose state funds in the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:48 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,589,742 times
Reputation: 8075
Oh, and at this time Louisiana isn't doing so bad in the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:50 AM
 
4,459 posts, read 4,218,288 times
Reputation: 648
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailordave View Post
According to what the article said and Governor Jindal, if these states' governors changed their state's rules and accepted the money then the state would be forced to pay out over time a larger sum than they received and thus loose state funds in the process.
Sorry, not buying the crap... Your ideology is so dated. Jindal is putting his own ambitions before his own people as Nagle put it. His judgment must have been clouded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:55 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,589,742 times
Reputation: 8075
Jindal to refuse some stimulus money (http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090220/pl_politico/19092 - broken link)
In a statement, Jindal, who is slated to give the Republican response to President Barack Obama’s message to Congress on Tuesday, expressed concern that expanding unemployment insurance coverage would lead to increased unemployment insurance taxes later on.
“The federal money in this bill will run out in less than three years for this benefit and our businesses would then be stuck paying the bill,” Jindal said. “We must be careful and thoughtful as we examine all the strings attached to the funding in this package. We cannot grow government in an unsustainable way.”
Jindal rejects $98 million in stimulus spending - Breaking News from New Orleans - Times-Picayune - NOLA.com
BATON ROUGE -- Saying that it could lead to a tax increase on state businesses, Gov. Bobby Jindal announced Friday that the state plans to reject as much as $98 million in federal unemployment assistance in the economic stimulus package.
Jindal, who has emerged as a leading Republican critic of the $787 billion spending and tax-cut bill signed into law this week by President Barack Obama, said the state would accept federal dollars for transportation projects and would not quarrel with a $25-per-week increase in unemployment benefits.

Both of those items are financed entirely with federal dollars and require the state only to accept the money. The part that Jindal rejected would require permanent changes in state law that the governor said makes it unacceptable. "You're talking about temporary federal spending triggering a permanent change in state law, " Jindal said.

At issue are two pots of federal money that states can access only if they agree to change their laws to make it easier for unemployed workers to qualify for benefits. To access the first pot of money, worth $32.8 million over 27 months, Louisiana would have to offer benefits to workers who have held jobs for as little as three months before becoming unemployed. Workers now have to hold a job for at least a year before they are eligible to collect unemployment.
The Louisiana Workforce Commission, which administers the state's unemployment insurance system, estimates that an additional 4,000 former workers would become eligible for benefits under that change.
A second pot of money, valued at $65.6 million, would be available to Louisiana only if it agreed to other, larger expansions of benefits. For example, the state could extend benefits to part-time workers or change the law so that people could collect unemployment if they voluntarily left their job for "compelling" family reasons.
As the Jindal administration interprets the law, Louisiana would be required to keep providing the expanded benefits even after the federal stimulus dollars run out at the end of 2010. That, in turn, would lead to higher costs on businesses, whose taxes finance the state's unemployment compensation fund.
According to the Workforce Commission, the expanded benefits would cost Louisiana companies $12 million a year after the federal money ends. The businesses, in turn, would pass those costs on to their workers. "I don't think it's good policy to take temporary federal dollars to create a permanent state spending obligation, " Jindal said.

Louisiana's 5.5 percent unemployment rate in December was well below the national rate of 7.6 percent. The state was one of only three that added jobs in December, along with Florida and Vermont.
The Louisiana Association of Business and Industry said in a news release that the benefit expansion contained in the federal law could have grave unintended consequences.
"Employers, who are the exclusive funding source for unemployment benefits, and unemployed workers, who are the benefit recipients, cannot afford this, " said Jim Patterson, head of LABI's employee relations council. Curt Eysink, a spokesman for the state Workforce Commission, said Louisiana businesses pay lower unemployment taxes on average than companies in other states and that unemployment benefits in the state are also below the national average.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:56 AM
 
Location: Houston Texas
2,915 posts, read 3,525,830 times
Reputation: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukester View Post
Obama is truly the best president this country has seen in a generation. He has accomplished more in 30 days than Bush did in 8 years, unbelievable. I really think the GOP do not know how to deal with Obama because of his amazing multitasking capabilities and his organizational skills which are just phenomenal. I don't think Bush could walk and chew gum at the same time,
Yeah, Obama is great at multitasking. He is appointing unethical individuals to his cabinet while at the same time getting us even more in the war AND screwing Americans back home with his whack porkulus package. Very impressive multitasking. Even worse than the George Bush multitasking disaster
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:56 AM
 
Location: New York, New York
4,906 posts, read 6,858,704 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukester View Post
Sorry, not buying the crap... Your ideology is so dated. Jindal is putting his own ambitions before his own people as Nagle put it. His judgment must have been clouded.
He was complaining about Jindahl the othe day today he loves him. They can't find what side they want to be on, so they are trying to cover all angles. Just more evidence of the op.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 02:00 AM
 
Location: New York, New York
4,906 posts, read 6,858,704 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailordave View Post
Oh, and at this time Louisiana isn't doing so bad in the economy.
The statistics don't back you up. Louisiana is in a big downward trend. I hope you don't put your ideology above those suffering.

Louisiana Economy at a Glance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top