Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 10-26-2020, 08:44 PM
 
14,101 posts, read 5,709,013 times
Reputation: 8727

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmccormick71 View Post
She’s a Trump pawn, installed by Trump to keep Trump in power. The Party of Trump does not care about the constitution. They care about remaining in power. Barrett, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are puppets. They were appointed to do Trump’s bidding and ensure that he remains in office.

They have already decided that states can’t make their own rules about counting mail in ballots. 6 people will choose the next President and they will choose Trump.
When did they decide states cannot make their own rules about counting mail in ballots? Which vote and when?
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2020, 08:45 PM
 
3,621 posts, read 1,811,995 times
Reputation: 4757
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
I'm sure she's competent.

This is great fodder for the base.

The base isn't what is going to win Trump the election.
I've always thought moderates/independents hate this court stacking thing -- and Trump is pulling out the stops. He most definitely has admitted choosing her for HIS agenda.

Not sure moderates/independents/swing voters think that's cool.

But you know base loves it.

So this energizes Trump -- makes him feel like -- look what I did....but it could be one of the things he said -- look what I did if he loses.

We won't know until next week.
What is “court stacking”? The senate filled an open seat with a well qualified judge who will uphold the laws passed by the legislature as written, and respect precedent. The Democrats tried to fill a seat during the last lame duck session, they’re the ones who made this possible by ending the filibuster for judges. For the better part of the last century we’ve had a Supreme Court where the majority was nominated by Democrat presidents, we’ve also mostly had a republican led senate. This is politics it goes back and forth. Filling an open seat isn’t stacking. Stacking would be adding judges.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2020, 08:46 PM
 
4,190 posts, read 4,916,068 times
Reputation: 3986
I find it appalling that none of the major networks broadcast her swearing in ceremony live.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2020, 08:48 PM
 
18,442 posts, read 15,901,465 times
Reputation: 26988
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmccormick71 View Post
It is hilarious to me that the posters on this forum DAILY call anyone who doesn’t worship Trump an evil leftist who must be destroyed but come unglued when anyone dare be half as vehement toward their side.

I have been told I should kill myself on this forum.

I have been called a literal demon from hell on this forum.

I have been told that I and anyone like me should be “put down like a dog” on this forum.

And those comments aren’t taken down, not one “really!!l or “seek help.”

You people are wallowing in rank hypocrisy.
It's almost like you don't understand the level of insanity and devotion to one man. This is not normal, they've formed an emotional attachment to their dear leader. They have emotions for him they don't have for any other.

Frankly, I think it's weird and bizarre to 'love' any political figure, but some think they're in a relationship with him. I've voted in many elections (since 1980) and there isn't one politician I've ever felt any 'love' or 'affection' for. Approve, disapprove, or neutral, yes. Love? No. These are not personal relationships, they are there to do a job they asked to be hired to do.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2020, 08:50 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,657 posts, read 6,257,712 times
Reputation: 8268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starglow View Post
I find it appalling that none of the major networks broadcast her swearing in ceremony live.
In all fairness, I don't believe a swearing in has ever been covered live on TV. At least I don't recall one.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2020, 08:54 PM
 
17,531 posts, read 9,343,626 times
Reputation: 11988
Quote:
Originally Posted by DorianRo View Post
Want to get those stimulus Checks? It will take months. Want to get those right wing judges in to start screwing the country up and taking everyone’s healthcare and workers rights away? Just a few days LOL true tyranny
Nancy Pelosi is the ONLY person holding up any mote Sid for the Corona Virusb... even she admits that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starglow View Post
I find it appalling that none of the major networks broadcast her swearing in ceremony live.
You are kidding ... none of them showed this tonight. What Scum they are.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2020, 08:56 PM
 
18,442 posts, read 15,901,465 times
Reputation: 26988
Has any major network ever broadcast a SCOTUS justice being sworn in...live?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2020, 09:05 PM
 
19,385 posts, read 6,543,604 times
Reputation: 12316
It was on FOX, live.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2020, 09:12 PM
 
9,500 posts, read 2,939,046 times
Reputation: 5283
Quote:
Originally Posted by DorianRo View Post
Want to get those stimulus Checks? It will take months. Want to get those right wing judges in to start screwing the country up and taking everyone’s healthcare and workers rights away? Just a few days LOL true tyranny
That stupid predictions been said for years and it has ever happened.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2020, 09:14 PM
 
9,500 posts, read 2,939,046 times
Reputation: 5283
Quote:
Originally Posted by lottamoxie View Post
It's almost like you don't understand the level of insanity and devotion to one man. This is not normal, they've formed an emotional attachment to their dear leader. They have emotions for him they don't have for any other.

Frankly, I think it's weird and bizarre to 'love' any political figure, but some think they're in a relationship with him. I've voted in many elections (since 1980) and there isn't one politician I've ever felt any 'love' or 'affection' for. Approve, disapprove, or neutral, yes. Love? No. These are not personal relationships, they are there to do a job they asked to be hired to do.
Kind of reminds you of Obama and Clinton campaign’s where huge crowds showed up and held on to every word.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top