Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That is not Trump, but the Arizona Government, thinking he is their property.
Take your dad out of the old folks home and take care of him until this is all over.
When I discovered the Rehab place my dad was at to recover from releasing pressure from his brain, had been abusing him(HUGE bed sore from his butt to the middle of his back). I shut down my business, and became his full time caretaker and sued the crap out of that place.
Sadly, that is too often the case in rehab facilities. Props to you for becoming his full-time caretaker. He'll be much better off for it. Hope you win the suit, because this type of abuse needs to be highlighted, and the center needs to be punished.
Just like the mayors and governors encouraged all the rioting/looting/vandalism by allowing it all to happen. Plus they didn't allow the police to do their jobs.
Again, no one is forcing anyone to go to any rallies.
That is not Trump, but the Arizona Government, thinking he is their property.
Take your dad out of the old folks home and take care of him until this is all over.
When I discovered the Rehab place my dad was at to recover from releasing pressure from his brain, had been abusing him(HUGE bed sore from his butt to the middle of his back). I shut down my business, and became his full time caretaker and sued the crap out of that place.
We dont agree much but: Massive salute to you for taking care of your father.
Anyway. We need an amendment: You must have standing to interfere in any election. You must be a member of an electorate to interfere in that election. No CA people interfering in an AZ election. No TX people interfering in a NM election.
Smashing Koch and Soros in the same amendment would be a beautiful thing.
We dont agree much but: Massive salute to you for taking care of your father.
Anyway. We need an amendment: You must have standing to interfere in any election. You must be a member of an electorate to interfere in that election. No CA people interfering in an AZ election. No TX people interfering in a NM election.
Smashing Koch and Soros in the same amendment would be a beautiful thing.
I agree. The only people who should be allowed to donate to a political candidate are people who are represented by that candidate.
In my state Amy McGrath, whose only other election involved losing to Representative Andy Barr, has a war chest beyond anything previously seen in our state, as in she spent 17 million during the primary, all against McConnell, in anticipation of the general. That money all came from outside the state, I believe one of the radio reporters said it was either 96 or 97%. Hysterically, she almost lost the primary to a previously little known guy with only local support. Since then she has received over $30M from ActBlue and another $43M from another national donation drive just for her (well, actually against McConnell). It is ridiculous.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
(Google it!)
