Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Younger disagrees with Ms. Georgulas that James is actually a girl named “Luna.” He has claimed Georgulas, in his opinion, would only show James love and affection when he would say he’s a girl and began showing James trans-related material, such as media from famed transgender child Jazz Jennings, when he was a toddler. In a video captured by Younger when the boy was just three years old, James tells his dad that “mommy” tells him he’s a girl and puts him in dresses."
Okay, if what is said above IS true, then would someone please explain to me why that would not be considered child abuse, and why if proven, his so-called mother would not lose all rights to James?
Here is another link, and it is so sad to read the account of a family friend who actually knows James.
I read that earlier and immediately wondered why (if true) the father allowed that instead of trying to get custody.
Where on Earth did you get the idea he didn't try to get custody? He so-called "allowed" it because he's been powerless to stop it and he's been fighting for months to get sole custody. The court not only denied his petition, but gave the mother the green light to proceed with "gender transition."
A lunatic leftist woman is together with the help of a district judge trying to have her 7 year old son chemically mutilated, and the boy's father is trying to intervene to stop that from happening.
A lunatic leftist woman is together with the help of a district judge trying to have her 7 year old son chemically mutilated, and the boy's father is trying to intervene to stop that from happening.
Thanks, Spartacus. I read that - but why would they deny the father custody? Is the judge nuts? The father lying? Do we even know?
https://www.dailywire.com/news/break...g-order-on-dad (On Thursday, Judge Kim Cooks ruled Texas father Jeffrey Younger has a say in his seven-year-old son’s gender “transition,” which is being facilitated by the boy’s mother and Younger’s ex-wife, Dr. Anne Georgulas. Younger is attempting to halt the boy’s transition.)
Probably 40 percent of the country is ok with the mother doing this to her son.
It is hard to imagine any liberal Democrat opposing this.
Where on Earth did you get the idea he didn't try to get custody? He so-called "allowed" it because he's been powerless to stop it and he's been fighting for months to get sole custody. The court not only denied his petition, but gave the mother the green light to proceed with "gender transition."
Jesus - calm down.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
