Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You have to get to the end to read the truth, as is usual with the MSM:
That's it. That is the limit that useless sites like Vox and MSM outlets are using to claim that the WH is "limiting" the investigation. Something that we already knew because Trump already stated, last week, that it was ONLY for allegations already on the table. They know the left would come out with more BS if they didn't put that on there, and you and all the other lefties know it, as well.
I hope that's true. I just know in the past Trump will say one thing and then say he never said it.
He’s already said he would if the committee wanted and likely has in the past given his clearances. I had to as well.
That would be good if he agreed to one regarding these latest allegations. I'm all for people being cleared of wrongdoing if that is the case. Personally, I have my doubts, but my doubts mean nothing of course.
I bet he's changed his tune now. But maybe not - maybe he will take one, who knows? Maybe he's taken them in the past, once again, who knows?
Probably has and seeing as one of the things they key in on are if you have anything in your past you can be blackmailed for and crimes you committed that you weren’t arrested for, they also help determine his truthfulness. Of note, those Senate Democrats knew this when they put on their show for the masses. But again, the exact questions are up to the examiner. I can only recount my experiences when getting a high level clearance.
I bet he's changed his tune now. But maybe not - maybe he will take one, who knows? Maybe he's taken them in the past, once again, who knows?
It would definitely lend to his credibility if he would.
In this entire situation I wonder if they are both right. Maybe he did assault her, but was so drunk he doesn't remember. Hopefully it can be resolved one way or the other.
Was that officially the longest thread ever on CD? I wouldn’t be surprised.
I was wondering the same thing. The other ones that come to mind are the I Can't Take It Anymore thread for the grammar Nazis among us and that ridiculous thread about Barbie's measurements and whether or not they were realistic (in case you're wondering, they are not). Anyone remember that thread? Although it eventually got locked by the mods, it was the source of many popcorn sales, I bet.
That would be good if he agreed to one regarding these latest allegations. I'm all for people being cleared of wrongdoing if that is the case. Personally, I have my doubts, but my doubts mean nothing of course.
I’m not a big fan of polys myself. Easy to beat or to get inconsistent results - depending on the person. Kathryn has an example of being one of those kinds of people.
Wayback has some but you need the url in question.
It will be getting worked on. Stuff will be found, and as usual, the cover up is worse than the "crime". Dems are going to regret this nonsense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.