Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-19-2018, 08:18 AM
 
20,454 posts, read 12,373,731 times
Reputation: 10250

Advertisements

That is wonderful! now if we can just figure out how to reduce their clout in the Electoral College.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-19-2018, 08:19 AM
 
Location: IL
1,874 posts, read 817,527 times
Reputation: 1133
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
Rural areas deserve more representation. It seems that living in big cities destroys people's ability to think clearly. Constantly on the go and their brains rattled by noise and air pollution causes long term degradation in their thought processes. Rural people who live at a slower pace, breathe clean air, and aren't compromised by noise pollution help keep our country from falling off a cliff. I think the founding fathers understood this.
the TDS microbe has gotten into city water supply
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2018, 08:20 AM
 
Location: IL
1,874 posts, read 817,527 times
Reputation: 1133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
That is wonderful! now if we can just figure out how to reduce their clout in the Electoral College.
no. move if you don't like it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2018, 08:20 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,512,088 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
Rural areas deserve more representation. It seems that living in big cities destroys people's ability to think clearly. Constantly on the go and their brains rattled by noise and air pollution causes long term degradation in their thought processes. Rural people who live at a slower pace, breathe clean air, and aren't compromised by noise pollution help keep our country from falling off a cliff. I think the founding fathers understood this.
They are already over represented. Land mass does not vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2018, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,721,455 times
Reputation: 6745
Quote:
Originally Posted by TristramShandy View Post
California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Texas. And yet the other 42 will have 84% of the power of the senate?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.536311a75859
And your point is what exactly? That the 8 States should exert their will over the 42?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2018, 08:29 AM
 
2,830 posts, read 2,502,245 times
Reputation: 2737
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
No, they do not.
So you prefer predominantly liberal urban areas dictate national policy for all eternity, is that it?

Gee, no conflict of interest there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2018, 08:30 AM
 
6,620 posts, read 5,006,134 times
Reputation: 3688
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
Rural areas deserve more representation. It seems that living in big cities destroys people's ability to think clearly. Constantly on the go and their brains rattled by noise and air pollution causes long term degradation in their thought processes. Rural people who live at a slower pace, breathe clean air, and aren't compromised by noise pollution help keep our country from falling off a cliff. I think the founding fathers understood this.
except for the opiods and something in the air that causes them to be on SSI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2018, 08:45 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUNNDFRNT View Post
except for the opiods and something in the air that causes them to be on SSI.
Again... That's overwhelmingly a Dem problem. Look at the stats for SSI. There's actual research on this. In a 2-party study, Dems are 2/3 of those on public assistance, SSI, etc.:

Are Welfare Recipients Mostly Republican or Democrat? - Tino Sanandaji, PhD

Chart, Democrats:

https://tino.us/wp-content/uploads/2...-1-695x632.png

Author's credentials:
PhD in Public Policy from the University of Chicago
MA in Economics from the University of Chicago
MSc from Stockholm School of Economics

Other info from the link:

Share of Recipients of each program that identified as supporters of the Republican party:

Gov. Subsidized Housing 12%
Medicaid: 16%
Food Stamps: 20%
Unemployment Compensation: 21%
Welfare or public assistance: 22%
Disability benefits from government 25% (compared to 64% Democrats)

Data source:
https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/campbell/programs/Merged_Data_Set

It's in the Dems' best interest to keep a certain percentage of the population poor and on public assistance to maintain their voter base. They wouldn't be able to win elections without them.
And even worse, it's minorities (Blacks, and to a lesser degree, Hispanics) who are very disproportionately kept poor.

Now that Dem voters understand that you're supporting the maintenance and growth of a perpetually poor and welfare-programs dependent underclass that MUST be kept poor in order to keep most of them voting Dem, will they all still go along with that?

Get a clue, Dems... Why do you think liberals are SO on board with "open borders" that keep low-end wages depressed? Doing so guarantees their voter base.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2018, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Pacific Beach/San Diego
4,750 posts, read 3,564,736 times
Reputation: 4614
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
Rural areas deserve more representation. It seems that living in big cities destroys people's ability to think clearly. Constantly on the go and their brains rattled by noise and air pollution causes long term degradation in their thought processes. Rural people who live at a slower pace, breathe clean air, and aren't compromised by noise pollution help keep our country from falling off a cliff. I think the founding fathers understood this.
The one's who have much less education? They're the ones who should have more representation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2018, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Pacific Beach/San Diego
4,750 posts, read 3,564,736 times
Reputation: 4614
Quote:
Originally Posted by my54ford View Post
And your point is what exactly? That the 8 States should exert their will over the 42?
My point is that it is an antiquated system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top