Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If I was a conservative I would be crying right now because the Court has a decidedly liberal bent now Scalia is gone ... just look at the decisions coming out of the Court these past two weeks!
This court has been to the left on some social issues but very much to the right on corporations, even some of the so called liberal justices have voted with the conservatives to protect businesses.
So, if the Democrats threaten to do this it's okay. But if the Republicans threaten to do it (and actually vow to carry it out) it's "unprecedented" and not okay?
There is a lot of hypocrisy here.
Lindsay Graham is one of the worst RINO's in Congress. He has betrayed his party more than stood with them.
The Pubs may very well be putting themselves in a situation where they lose, no matter what, by their obstructionism.
As if the Democrats ha never been obstructionists. We need to look no further back than the last 7 years. Harry Reid had over 300 Republican bills on his desk which had never been acted upon.
That makes less sense than me taking the time to respond.
That assumes a lot -- no one's been nominated.
What other policies does this nonexistent entity posses that you disgaree with?
Reversing course is something they excel at.
It doesn't take much assuming to figure Obama would nominate someone with his, Sotomayor, Kagan pov on major social policy issues such as abortion, gay marriage, Obamacare, Hobby Lobby, etc..
Your theory that the R's will lose SC cases without a 9th Justice is, to put it mildly, odd.
So, if the Democrats threaten to do this it's okay. But if the Republicans threaten to do it (and actually vow to carry it out) it's "unprecedented" and not okay?
There is a lot of hypocrisy here.
Lindsay Graham is one of the worst RINO's in Congress. He has betrayed his party more than stood with them.
Threatening is one thing, actually following up on a threat is quite different.
Coming from a Democrat this is extremely funny. The party that wants to take away our constitutional rights.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
, the R's could reverse course and hold hearings.
