Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am all for enforcing immigration laws, though I think it would be more cost effective to go after those that hire illegals rather than illegals themselves.
When Kim Davis was in the news, Liberals were fuming over her actions. Davis, they said, was not following the rule of law set down by the Supreme Court. She was not, I agree, and she was publicly shamed for it. A new chapter in the story recently emerged: Kentucky Governor-elect Matt Bevin will not require marriage clerks to sign the license, yet gay marriage licenses will still be given out whether or not the clerk has religious objections. He came up with a solution that pleases everyone, so hats off to Governor-elect Bevin!
On the other side of the aisle, Liberals seem hell-bent on preventing the enforcement of illegal immigration laws. Amnesty is often a word that they throw around, which is only rewarding the lawbreakers. How can Liberals, on one hand, bash Davis for not complying with the law, yet they want to reward illegal immigrants for breaking it? Is that not entirely hypocritical?
I would like some left-leaning people to explain their thinking if at all possible.
I am all for enforcing immigration laws, though I think it would be more cost effective to go after those that hire illegals rather than illegals themselves.
Both parties are breaking the law. Why would you support only going after one party?
How can Liberals, on one hand, bash Davis for not complying with the law, yet they want to reward illegal immigrants for breaking it? Is that not entirely hypocritical?
I would like some left-leaning people to explain their thinking if at all possible.
I'm not a liberal, but Kim Davis was standing in the way of the law when she refused to sign those marriage licensed.
That said, what part of Illegal Immigrant don't you understand?
I'm not a liberal, but Kim Davis was standing in the way of the law when she refused to sign those marriage licensed.
That said, what part of Illegal Immigrant don't you understand?
Are you asking me?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's a big hole inyour premise
