Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2016, 10:40 AM
 
1,431 posts, read 912,837 times
Reputation: 1316

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pslOldTimer View Post
Compare two different situations.

A) You make $100,000 per year, and your expenditures for things you consider absolutely essential (food, shelter, transportation, health care, etc.) could be maintained a less than $50,000 per year, letting you control whether or not you pay taxes on the other $50,000. If you choose not to consume tangible items that are taxes, you essentially have 50% of your income tax-free.

B) You make $20,000 per year, and you wish you could afford even the most basic expenditures on that amount. It's even harder, however, because you have to pay taxes on 100% of your income, because all of it must be spent.

Only a conservative who has never had to live paycheck-to-paycheck and worry about where the next dollar is coming from would consider that fair.
So someone paying half your annual salary in just taxes isn't fair?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2016, 11:04 AM
 
8,418 posts, read 7,414,580 times
Reputation: 8767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
The Fair Tax Calculator

Make use of the opportunity for an education.
Does the calculator have a flaw in it?

It assumes that the price of gods won't rise, yet the 23% included national sales tax (30% effective sales tax) is simply going to be tacked on to the total cost of goods and services purchased. Basically, one's "Total Maximum Taxable Consumption Available Annually" is going to wind up purchasing less Total Maximum Goods and Services Available Annually.

If I buy a gallon of milk now for $3.00, then assuming that I had a Total Max Taxable Consumption Available Annually of $10K, then I'd be able to buy 3,333 gallons of milk.

If I buy a gallon of milk with the Fair Tax in place, then the price of the milk rises to $3.90 per gallon. With the same $10K, I'd only be able to buy 2,565 gallons of milk. The cost of the missing milk purchased goes to pay the Fair Tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2016, 11:43 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,198,564 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by scamutz View Post
Everything that I've read or heard about Fair Tax sounds great...and I don't think that I've ever heard anyone come out strongly against it. Just the thought of tax being based on consumption rather than income seems fundamentally fair. I would love to be in a position that I could control the taxes that I paid. I would think that manufacturing would take a hit as people tried to avoid buying new cars etc...but other than that, what's not to love about it?

I don't claim to be an expert here, and admittedly, need to learn more, but I'm willing to bet that there are some on the forum that have studied it extensively and I'm curious to hear what you think.

the fair tax can succeed. only if the 16th Amendment is repealed, most of the irs fired and a max % limit is put into place on how much the fair tax can be taxed at.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2016, 12:45 PM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14282
Quote:
Originally Posted by FistFightingHairdresser View Post
Hi,

A lot of teachers, policemen, firemen, and other hard-working people make $20K or less. Meanwhile a person with a trust fund can sit and do nothing yet make a fortune on interest. So who deserves to keep a bigger piece of pie?

I'd like to see the math where someone pays 50% of their higher rate of income in taking a second job. The highest rate is only 35% on income over $326,000.

I'm not at war with the rich either, I just think we should always err in favor of the middle and lower class. It would be awesome if most of us would only have to fork over 10% or less in income tax.

And a 100% tax on income over $1M/yr would only cause 144,000 people to scream. Who cares?
"A lot of teachers, policemen, firemen, and other hard-working people make $20K"

Take out the "other hard-working people" and give some facts to back this claim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2016, 02:16 PM
 
20,718 posts, read 19,363,240 times
Reputation: 8288
I come out strongly against the "fair tax" all the time. How in the hell can anyone justify taxes on goods and services other than by some kind of Marxist ideology? Its probably even worse than the current income tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2016, 02:23 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
I come out strongly against the "fair tax" all the time. How in the hell can anyone justify taxes on goods and services other than by some kind of Marxist ideology? Its probably even worse than the current income tax.
Are you actually under the impression you're not paying taxes on goods and services?

I hope you're trying to be funny, because that is a riot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2016, 02:26 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
Does the calculator have a flaw in it?

It assumes that the price of gods won't rise, yet the 23% included national sales tax (30% effective sales tax) is simply going to be tacked on to the total cost of goods and services purchased. Basically, one's "Total Maximum Taxable Consumption Available Annually" is going to wind up purchasing less Total Maximum Goods and Services Available Annually.

If I buy a gallon of milk now for $3.00, then assuming that I had a Total Max Taxable Consumption Available Annually of $10K, then I'd be able to buy 3,333 gallons of milk.

If I buy a gallon of milk with the Fair Tax in place, then the price of the milk rises to $3.90 per gallon. With the same $10K, I'd only be able to buy 2,565 gallons of milk. The cost of the missing milk purchased goes to pay the Fair Tax.
Everybody will actually be either paying less in taxes and/or receiving a prebate. Additionally, the cost of taking goods to the market would be reduced to companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2016, 08:19 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
Does the calculator have a flaw in it?

It assumes that the price of gods won't rise
, yet the 23% included national sales tax (30% effective sales tax) is simply going to be tacked on to the total cost of goods and services purchased. Basically, one's "Total Maximum Taxable Consumption Available Annually" is going to wind up purchasing less Total Maximum Goods and Services Available Annually.

If I buy a gallon of milk now for $3.00, then assuming that I had a Total Max Taxable Consumption Available Annually of $10K, then I'd be able to buy 3,333 gallons of milk.

If I buy a gallon of milk with the Fair Tax in place, then the price of the milk rises to $3.90 per gallon. With the same $10K, I'd only be able to buy 2,565 gallons of milk. The cost of the missing milk purchased goes to pay the Fair Tax.

since the FairTax would replace the income tax AND payroll taxes, there would be a producer cost reduction that would exert downward pressure on prices.

and if i can be a wiseguy for a bit, i can assure you the price of gods will not rise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2016, 08:25 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by UB50 View Post
I find it odd that people complain about property taxes they pay. It's a privilege to own property! If you don't want to pay property taxes, don't own property! Think of all the RENTERS in this country who pay a hidden property tax (because you know the owners of the property pass that tax along) but DON'T EVEN GET TO CLAIM IT ON THEIR INCOME TAXES!

There are a lot of single wage earners with no kids in the states of California and New York who earn over $50K a year and can file on the short form. Those of you who feel so ripped off by what you are paying in taxes ought to see what these people pay in taxes.

It's even worse than you think. Most states allow higher property taxes on rental property than on owner-occupied homes, e.g. in Michigan the typical rental house has more than $1,000 a year in extra property tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2016, 08:32 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
Money you pay for medical or house interest would be automatically deducted.
Everybody pays the same when they buy something doing away with loopholes.
Income made on interest, bonds, stocks and used to purchase products would pay taxes also.
Illegals would pay the same amount we do. No free ride--that would make the decision for me.

Unfortunately, that's not quite how the FairTax works.

If you buy an existing home, there is no tax. (Because the home was originally purchased with after-income tax dollars, the home was effectively taxed in the beginning and once an item is taxed it is never taxed again.)

If you rent an existing home, rent is taxed because it is considered a service. Therefore the FairTax would allow people who buy an existing home to enjoy untaxed consumption while renters must pay tax month after month after month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top