Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The polling company is heavily biased towards democrats. Please use a non biased polling company.
Public Policy Polling:
It is a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.
And~
"the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture [7] and whether hipsters should be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]
The polling company is heavily biased towards democrats. Please use a non biased polling company.
Public Policy Polling:
It is a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.
And~
"the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture [7] and whether hipsters should be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]
Think about what you just said, for just on minute....
Then I ask,
Is Nancy Pelosi a Senator from California?
Begich D-AK, will likely be put to pasture this time around, by Parnell. That is one less democrat in the Senate.
In head-to-head matchups against Democratic Senator Mark Begich, Parnell is the only Republican who starts out with a lead (Parnell 46%, Begich 40%). Parnell’s strength is among younger voters 18-to-35 and 36-to-45 years old who pick Parnell 43%-38% and 51%-36% respectively.
I say yes she is right and we definitely need to do the things she states. I see her as a someone who is more informed than Obama pertaining to critical issues this country faces. Sarah Palin would put the countries needs first instead of hindering our nations progress like putative President Obama has done.
As a democrat I often desire to have informative, civilized, and meaningful conversations with this forums republicans. But it hardly ever happens.
I believe one of the reasons is republicans always come out with attacks at the start of the conversation. Like you starting your thread by saying "Sarah Palin would put the countries needs first instead of hindering our nations progress like putative President Obama has done."
Why not start a thread by saying something like "Sarah Palin has some ideas on energy policy, what do you think?"
[MOD CUT/off topic]
Last edited by Ibginnie; 02-10-2014 at 10:01 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
