Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
New York probably gonna just fold now that Hannity's leaving.
We can certainly hope that will be the case.
It also would not be unprecedented. New York has been broke before. Liberal freaks ran it into the ground during the 1970s and would have bankrupted the State had not US taxpayers bailed them out.
So as long as New York, or any other State, is under Democrat management you can be absolutely certain that it will eventually go bankrupt ... again. It is the one thing Democrats do very well.
New York's loss is Florida's gain. Hopefully all the liberals left in New York get to pay even more taxes to make up for all the tax revenue Cuomo just drove out of the state.
[/indent]
It says a lot about his intelligence when he says he hates taxes, and yet chose to live in the county with 2nd highest taxes in the nation
This story is just more proof that so-called "tolerant" liberals are the most intolerant people on earth.
You have that backwards. Isn't it conservative Hannity who is too sensitive to tolerate what Cuomo said that he now feels the need to move? Talk about intolerant.
"Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are."
extreme...
as in throwing the baby out with the bath water or calling the NJ governor a traitor for shaking hands with Obama after a hurricane.
you know.. the kind of conservative who would rather lose an election than win one with a repub who isn't an "extreme" conservative.
Hannity is all babble! If he leaves New York, then let him go!
Hannity as a commentator means no one any good. Some Conservative Whites look up to him and feed off of his sewage. He loves getting racist and vulnerable White people wound up.
He is a very very bad man. Anyone who makes millions creating discord between Americans, shouldn't be missed.
I also seem to recall Hannity stating that US citizens were leaving the country for Great Britain and other countries in record numbers back around 2010 because of Obama, funny guy.
I think he might have been alluding to the number of people renouncing their citizenship hitting fresh record highs each year Obama's been in office, though that has a lot more to do with the policies Obama enacted than Obama just being there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
It says a lot about his intelligence when he says he hates taxes, and yet chose to live in the county with 2nd highest taxes in the nation
Perhaps other considerations have outweighed the tax burden until now. Given your statement, you should be praising him now that he's ridding himself of that problem, but I suppose pushing a partisan agenda is more important.
Quote:
Originally Posted by northnut
You have that backwards. Isn't it conservative Hannity who is too sensitive to tolerate what Cuomo said that he now feels the need to move? Talk about intolerant.
Cuomo can't tolerate conservatives being in the same state he is, yet you say Hannity is intolerant and Cuomo isn't?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner
extreme...
as in throwing the baby out with the bath water or calling the NJ governor a traitor for shaking hands with Obama after a hurricane.
This is a little more intimate than just shaking hands, and being so chummy and warm towards Obama during that entire time period was simply gratuitous on his part. He handed Obama good publicity on a silver platter when he didn't need to do so to get help for his state, and did nothing remotely comparable for Mitt Romney, his own party's nominee which he endorsed. I wouldn't call it traitorous, but I would call it backstabbing.
Quote:
you know.. the kind of conservative who would rather lose an election than win one with a repub who isn't an "extreme" conservative.
Electing someone who isn't a conservative does not advance conservatism or put conservatives in office, so why should conservatives do so? The objective is to implement conservatism, and that requires a conservative majority, not just a majority of people with an R by their name. Think in terms of ideology, not party, and you will understand why conservatives won't (and shouldn't) support candidates who are not conservative.
And be surrounded by the low income uneducated people they prey on yet don't give a **** about?
How do they prey upon these people? Please wise liberal, tell me how you and your leftist kind come up with this stuff.
Last edited by D-Towner; 01-21-2014 at 08:14 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
